K1LL3R 1NS1D3

What about free for the v2 and $35 for the k&n filter and the dryflow in the trash. Yeah i guess the dryflow went to waist i could of sold it to someone that likes them.

K1LL3R 1NS1D3

You would have to traverse a river to submerge the filter in water on a CAI. Theres at least 10-12" from the lowest point of the filter and the ground and im lowered 3".

slowpokeS2K

haha, tell that to the guy who ran over a 6" puddle and hydro-locked his motor...

im not sure if the filter location is the same on the v2 versus the injen, but my filter is about 5-6 inches from the ground.

H22toF20

Unless you literally submerge the filter, you'll have no problem with hydro-lock.

JDMpearlwhyteZ

On the v2 the filter is angled up.. But I doubt it makes that much of a difference over the injen.. Which is probably modeled after the v1..

Anyways.. Can't you get the dry flow filters in different sizes?? Because that one is just over kill my man..

chubbychu

I'm running the 3" blox velocity stack and add-on filter, and that thing is HUGE both conically and by length.

I'm thinking about chopping off an inch from the tubing i just deleted the high horn.

starchland

What is the part #?

I have been toying around as well with getting a dryflow for a long time. Apparently, though, it is best to have the shortest filter possible that still flows enough CFM, since the shorter filter will have better air flow characteristics.

However, I plan on adding a Bpi velocity stack with mine.

NoRegrets78

21-2039BF

How is having a shorter filter better? I'm not following the logic on that. If that indeed is the case thats fine but some proof would be appreciated! The only thing I had to go on was another member saying that the shorter version hurt his top end. There wasn't much else to go on, so I had no choice but to take it on faith.

If I have too big of a filter I'll remove this and get a smaller one but I'd like to see the documentation that says why shorter is better.

NoRegrets78

Incidentally, back in 2006 one of the Moderators of the Ridgeline Owners club, of which I am also a member, was working with K&N directly to have them test the filtration of their media vs. the OEM paper filter used on the Ridgeline.

After much back and forth, they had the test results but would only share them with the Moderator if he signed a Confidentiality Agreement. Now why would they do that if their filter was indeed superior? Wouldn't a test in the favor of K&N only help sell more filters? Smells fishy to me.

Thread: http://www.ridgelineownersclub.com/forums/...?t=10708&page=9

NoRegrets78

Did some research on the velocity stack, there is one built into the dryflow filters already.