The S2000 Gallery Cornucopia of sight and sound! Show your friends your S2000 photos, S2000 images, S2000 photochops and S2000 videos.

Official Enkei RPF1 Thread

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-13-2010 | 11:03 AM
  #3191  
CapoArgentino's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,929
Likes: 0
Default

Alright check this out. The 17x9 +45 w/ 255s all around has convinced me BUT:

* I'd like a staggered setup. Honda engineers did it like this for a reason.
* I HATE the convex fronts that most people run. Looks ugly as hell. Concave is the way to go on these wheels IMO.

SO, Im keeping the rears at 17x9 +45 w/ 255s but I'd like to run 17x8 on the fronts while having the same/or super similar concave degree as the rears and also the same amount of lip as the rears (Or again, super similar).

So maybe running 17x8 +38 w/ 235s fronts will achieve this. I understand offsets and wheel stuff but I need to draw this on paper to see the results. Reason I said +38 is because I know this is an available offset. Not sure about less, +20 would be ideal according to my calculations:

CONVERSION:
1 inch = 25.4 millimeter

So running an inch less on fronts means that so to achieve similar 'lip and concave degree' as seen in rears you would need to run +20 (Basically 45mm - 25mm = 20mm offset)

Hope everyone understood my explanation of what I want to do. Thoughts? Thanks
Old 02-13-2010 | 11:11 AM
  #3192  
CapoArgentino's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,929
Likes: 0
Default

Alright, just checked Enkei's website. The lowest offset for 17x8 is +35mm



This is good s***! I have a good feeling this will achieve the results. I guess +38 is not avail for 17x8 after all.

UPDATE!!

Never mind, this is what 17x8 +35mm looks like

Enkei RPF1 17x8 +35
Old 02-13-2010 | 11:28 AM
  #3193  
txs2knoah's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 8,458
Likes: 0
From: Bayside
Default

This thread will live on.
Old 02-13-2010 | 01:35 PM
  #3194  
S2K Medic's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
Default

I still want some 10" +18 rears!!! I have 9.5" +38 and I still have room, not much but it's more than I want.
Old 02-13-2010 | 03:00 PM
  #3195  
JDMQuip's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,441
Likes: 1
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Originally Posted by anarkia1ces,Feb 13 2010, 12:03 PM
Alright check this out. The 17x9 +45 w/ 255s all around has convinced me BUT:

* I'd like a staggered setup. Honda engineers did it like this for a reason.
* I HATE the convex fronts that most people run. Looks ugly as hell. Concave is the way to go on these wheels IMO.

SO, Im keeping the rears at 17x9 +45 w/ 255s but I'd like to run 17x8 on the fronts while having the same/or super similar concave degree as the rears and also the same amount of lip as the rears (Or again, super similar).

So maybe running 17x8 +38 w/ 235s fronts will achieve this. I understand offsets and wheel stuff but I need to draw this on paper to see the results. Reason I said +38 is because I know this is an available offset. Not sure about less, +20 would be ideal according to my calculations:

CONVERSION:
1 inch = 25.4 millimeter

So running an inch less on fronts means that so to achieve similar 'lip and concave degree' as seen in rears you would need to run +20 (Basically 45mm - 25mm = 20mm offset)

Hope everyone understood my explanation of what I want to do. Thoughts? Thanks
No matter what you're still going to have the convex front. All you're doing is making the wheel stick out a tad bit more in the front with the +38. Not only that you're going to have to do a lot of front fender work to make it fit.

Why not just go with a 17x9 +45 all around but stagger JUST the tires?
Old 02-13-2010 | 03:24 PM
  #3196  
S_special's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,120
Likes: 3
From: OC, CA
Default

Originally Posted by JDMQuip,Feb 13 2010, 08:15 AM
I went to True Line in El Cajon. They got tired of me there. LOL. I was there 3 times in one week trying to get the right specs. All in all they're all cool. One of the workers there owns an S2K.
wtf. el cajon, i use to live in that city. is that a flat rack?
Old 02-13-2010 | 04:22 PM
  #3197  
CapoArgentino's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,929
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JDMQuip,Feb 13 2010, 04:00 PM
No matter what you're still going to have the convex front. All you're doing is making the wheel stick out a tad bit more in the front with the +38. Not only that you're going to have to do a lot of front fender work to make it fit.

Why not just go with a 17x9 +45 all around but stagger JUST the tires?
You are 100% correct

Yeah I searched the alternatives and they are all convex

So i will stagger the tires. 255 rear and 235 front. Front will be streching a bit but shouldn't be that much.
Old 02-13-2010 | 06:48 PM
  #3198  
CapoArgentino's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,929
Likes: 0
Default

Full set. Gold RPF1 17x9 +45



Im probly going to get mine from these guys, unless someone knows were I can get them cheaper.
Old 02-13-2010 | 06:53 PM
  #3199  
JDMQuip's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,441
Likes: 1
From: San Diego, CA
Default

^- That's a good price.
Old 02-13-2010 | 06:55 PM
  #3200  
Ezekiel55's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
Default

Originally Posted by S2K Medic,Feb 13 2010, 02:35 PM
I still want some 10" +18 rears!!! I have 9.5" +38 and I still have room, not much but it's more than I want.
Damn man! That would look good. You think that would fit with just rolled and pulled rears? I'm thinking you'd have to cut your fenders...
anyways...
Do It!


Quick Reply: Official Enkei RPF1 Thread



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:19 AM.