Just picked up an NSX as my new toy...
08-31-2009, 01:13 PM
#642
Originally Posted by starbai,Aug 18 2009, 11:08 AM
anyway to get a high res version of this one?
I'd love to blow it up print it and put it in my office... a reminder of what I'll have some day if you will....
If you could hook that up i'd really appreciate it: starbai@gmail.com
I'd love to blow it up print it and put it in my office... a reminder of what I'll have some day if you will....
If you could hook that up i'd really appreciate it: starbai@gmail.com
08-31-2009, 08:38 PM
#646
Originally Posted by s4play,Aug 18 2009, 06:53 AM
nice cars nonetheless
08-31-2009, 09:46 PM
#647
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Irvine
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by usdmej,Aug 31 2009, 08:38 PM
it's really sad what people are calling "pro" pics these days
nice cars nonetheless
nice cars nonetheless
08-31-2009, 11:06 PM
#648
Originally Posted by acumo,Aug 31 2009, 09:46 PM
can't say that and not show your own work
technically they're pro shots in the sense that the photographer was probably paid for his services (or offers his services for a price). but beyond that it seems like these days anyone that slaps a watermark on all their pictures and has an overzealous predisposition for abusing the brightness/contrast settings on adobe photoshop fancies themselves as a pro
that being said i don't even consider myself a camera enthusiast, maybe a casual amateur photographer
sorry for hi-jacking the thread OP, i'll quit hatin on your pics now =P
09-01-2009, 08:14 AM
#649
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Irvine
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by usdmej,Aug 31 2009, 11:06 PM
lol why u gotta call me out like that
technically they're pro shots in the sense that the photographer was probably paid for his services (or offers his services for a price). but beyond that it seems like these days anyone that slaps a watermark on all their pictures and has an overzealous predisposition for abusing the brightness/contrast settings on adobe photoshop fancies themselves as a pro
that being said i don't even consider myself a camera enthusiast, maybe a casual amateur photographer
sorry for hi-jacking the thread OP, i'll quit hatin on your pics now =P
technically they're pro shots in the sense that the photographer was probably paid for his services (or offers his services for a price). but beyond that it seems like these days anyone that slaps a watermark on all their pictures and has an overzealous predisposition for abusing the brightness/contrast settings on adobe photoshop fancies themselves as a pro
that being said i don't even consider myself a camera enthusiast, maybe a casual amateur photographer
sorry for hi-jacking the thread OP, i'll quit hatin on your pics now =P
