S2KI Honda S2000 Forums

The S2000 Gallery Cornucopia of sight and sound! Show your friends your S2000 photos, S2000 images, S2000 photochops and S2000 videos.

0-60m/h in 1.67secs?

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-27-2006, 05:22 AM
  #1  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
energetic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Athens, Greece, Europe, Earth, Universe
Posts: 30,032
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Angry 0-60m/h in 1.67secs?
http://www.barabus.info/tkr.asp





energetic is offline  
Reply Like
Old 07-27-2006, 06:05 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
s2kshift9k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 8,367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
thats crazy but i think the back of that car is straight UGLY!
s2kshift9k is offline  
Reply Like
Old 07-27-2006, 06:13 AM
  #3  

 
LoudMusic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: In The Ether
Posts: 3,708
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default
It looks like a Zonda and an S7.

1.67 seconds, eh? What are the 0 - 60 times for top fuel drag cars?
LoudMusic is offline  
Reply Like
Old 07-27-2006, 06:58 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
sweetmeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Philly Suburbs
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by LoudMusic,Jul 27 2006, 10:13 AM
It looks like a Zonda and an S7.

1.67 seconds, eh? What are the 0 - 60 times for top fuel drag cars?
TF dragsters hit 100 in about .75 seconds.

i dont buy the 1.67 0-60 for the car, that would require some serious traction.
sweetmeat is offline  
Reply Like
Old 07-27-2006, 07:06 AM
  #5  

 
LoudMusic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: In The Ether
Posts: 3,708
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by sweetmeat,Jul 27 2006, 08:58 AM
TF dragsters hit 100 in about .75 seconds.

i dont buy the 1.67 0-60 for the car, that would require some serious traction.
Agreed. It takes rather large tires to get the kind of traction they need to make a 1.7 second 60mph and when the tires are that large they aren't functional on the road.

However!

They could have set their times using custom configurations. Not exactly honest, but it would accomplish their marketing goals.
LoudMusic is offline  
Reply Like
Old 07-27-2006, 07:11 AM
  #6  

 
e3opian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 28,455
Received 228 Likes on 143 Posts
Default
Probably a theoretical 0-60 based on HP / weight or something..
e3opian is offline  
Reply Like
Old 07-27-2006, 08:06 AM
  #7  
Registered User

 
clawhammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 25,683
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default
clawhammer is offline  
Reply Like

Trending Topics

Old 07-27-2006, 09:59 AM
  #8  
Registered User

 
dmw16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by JanNov s2k,Jul 27 2006, 06:05 AM
thats crazy but i think the back of that car is straight UGLY!
Too bad, cuz that is the only part most of us would ever see
dmw16 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 07-27-2006, 03:12 PM
  #9  

 
hk_s2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: California
Posts: 73,565
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by dmw16,Jul 27 2006, 09:59 AM
Too bad, cuz that is the only part most of us would ever see
hk_s2k is offline  
Reply Like
Old 07-27-2006, 03:36 PM
  #10  

 
silentdancer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 18,524
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default
the grill makes it look cheap to me.
silentdancer is offline  
Reply Like



Advanced Search
Quick Reply: 0-60m/h in 1.67secs?


Reply Closed Thread Share

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:42 AM.