*VID* S2000 on SPEED
#13
Originally Posted by mic_crispy,Feb 14 2006, 07:18 PM
link to the other thread?
but yeah, give credit where its due, that guy was way too harsh... that civic and tegra where very fast..
but yeah, give credit where its due, that guy was way too harsh... that civic and tegra where very fast..
#14
Originally Posted by mackeywatson,Feb 14 2006, 07:33 PM
Ya that's kinda funny...he was saying how front wheel drive cars are not true race cars and don't belong on the track yet the two cars in front of him are fwd.
The only reason the other two cars were ahead of him is because #1 the leader had more power and #2 the guy sucked at driving, otherwise he would lead.
#15
Originally Posted by S2K9000,Feb 14 2006, 06:51 PM
I'm fairly sure he was referring to the internals(engine itself), and if I am not mistaken he is a member here. I hardly think that should warrant calling him "A tool."
They guy obviously used the incorrect term but come on guys, he obviously modded his engine and says he didnt.
#16
You guys have to remember that the Honda Cup race series has rules. S2000s are handicapped while the Civics and integras are lighter and make more power. Despite that, if Karner hadn't rolled his car, the championship would have gone to an S2000.
#18
Originally Posted by S2K9000,Feb 14 2006, 08:14 PM
No that is forced induction, but it is obvious you want to win this little arguement. You still called an accomplished member of this board a tool. The fact is there are strict rules so the engine itself(block and head) are stock if I am not mistaken.
I just find it very contradictory that he says "dead stock" when in fact it is MODIFIED.
He never mentioned the internals were stock. Stock is stock and modified is modified. What is there to argue about?