Vortech or Comptech
#31
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dry Branch
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by xviper,Sep 5 2006, 11:49 PM
Taking the drivers and the street racing environment out of the equation, here's what I think ...................
4.3 gears give you a 5% bump in gearing. Let's say the Vortech runs 300 whp. If your Comptech were pushing 285 whp, I would say the 2 cars would be very close.
4.3 gears give you a 5% bump in gearing. Let's say the Vortech runs 300 whp. If your Comptech were pushing 285 whp, I would say the 2 cars would be very close.
In any event, I dare say that drivers vary more than 5%.
#32
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dry Branch
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by xviper,Sep 6 2006, 12:15 AM
I haven't for a single moment, regretted going the Vortech route. I bolted the thing on and it's been serving me well for many years. It's my daily driver and I've never had any significant issues with it. It's been many 10s of thousands of miles and I'm still on the original belt.
The turbos of the day would have been a total nightmare. Although we do see the turbo kits of today being far more superior to yesterday's products, it can't yet be said that they are reliable for many years and high miles of use without needing something during their lifespan. Having a "Turbo" S2000 may sound very exotic but after years of day to day driving, all you really want is reliability without worry. Perhaps in the years to come, this statement will have to be revised. If you want instant gratification with no regard to where your car will be at in a year or two, get a turbo. If you can be satisfied with what a stock S/C kit will give you and all you want is to bolt it on and go, get the supercharger.
You can always get the FMIC "look" by replacing the stock aftercooler radiator with one of these:
It doesn't perform any better than the stock unit, but it definately makes onlookers wonder.
The turbos of the day would have been a total nightmare. Although we do see the turbo kits of today being far more superior to yesterday's products, it can't yet be said that they are reliable for many years and high miles of use without needing something during their lifespan. Having a "Turbo" S2000 may sound very exotic but after years of day to day driving, all you really want is reliability without worry. Perhaps in the years to come, this statement will have to be revised. If you want instant gratification with no regard to where your car will be at in a year or two, get a turbo. If you can be satisfied with what a stock S/C kit will give you and all you want is to bolt it on and go, get the supercharger.
You can always get the FMIC "look" by replacing the stock aftercooler radiator with one of these:
It doesn't perform any better than the stock unit, but it definately makes onlookers wonder.
How much does that big old front mount radiator weigh when it's full of water?
What does it cost to replace when a stone flies up from the road and punches a hole?
#33
Originally Posted by xviper,Sep 5 2006, 09:15 PM
You can always get the FMIC "look" by replacing the stock aftercooler radiator with one of these:
It doesn't perform any better than the stock unit, but it definately makes onlookers wonder.
It doesn't perform any better than the stock unit, but it definately makes onlookers wonder.
#36
Originally Posted by RED MX5,Sep 5 2006, 11:28 PM
In any event, I dare say that drivers vary more than 5%.
How much does that big old front mount radiator weigh when it's full of water?
What does it cost to replace when a stone flies up from the road and punches a hole?
What does it cost to replace when a stone flies up from the road and punches a hole?
As for what it would cost to replace it if it got a rock through it, I wouldn't replace it. It would be garbaged and the stock one goes back on. It was a very expensive excercise just for the "look".
#37
Originally Posted by backman_66,Sep 6 2006, 12:01 AM
Oh hey xviper looks like I'll have to get that for all of my onlookers as well
Read my previous reply to RED. I'm still not that impressed with it.
#38
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How are the vortec for black box issues? I've read on honda-tech that one guy is on his 4th box..... can't seem to get a good one from vortec.
#39
Originally Posted by EK9MAX,Sep 6 2006, 10:00 AM
How are the vortec for black box issues? I've read on honda-tech that one guy is on his 4th box..... can't seem to get a good one from vortec.
This guy was from H-T you say? Well, OK.