S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Valve retainer/spring upgrade

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-08-2005, 04:50 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
kane.s2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Beach, CA
Posts: 5,372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There's more air flowing in and more air flowing out. It keeps the valve open a little more since the air is rushing out/in.

That's the simplified understanding of it. It's hard to close a door when the wind is blowing one way or it closes too easy when the door has wind blowing the other way and vice versa.

That being said - no you probably dont need to upgrade. Just check all clearances and look for any cracks and wear. If you're going to replace, OEM is the most hassle free and longest lasting.
Old 06-08-2005, 04:56 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
kane.s2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Beach, CA
Posts: 5,372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FF2Skip,Jun 8 2005, 05:45 PM
That's the key and why I'm concerned. An owner in my part of the east coast ran the car to 10k and floated a valve. Bumping it to 9500 was a possibility I was/am willing to explore.
Don't even think about with stock valvetrain
Old 06-08-2005, 04:59 PM
  #13  
Moderator

 
AusS2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Sydney
Posts: 30,811
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

What is the story with Titanium retainers? From what I've heard they are 'harder' than stock and hence 'fatigue' quicker. Is that right?

If so, I guess they are a good race part but not ideal for long term reliability. In fact they may actually be a step backwards. Are there any 'stronger' retainers?

NB. The quoted words are used in their Materials Properties sense.
Old 06-08-2005, 05:15 PM
  #14  

 
Silver S2k4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't want to highjack this thread but how realistic is it to rev the f22 to say 8,500 using the EMS? I really want to try this because I just don't have enough RPMs and they go so quick with the SC.
Old 06-08-2005, 07:06 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
kane.s2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Beach, CA
Posts: 5,372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There was a post about this a while back and was pretty through. Titanium is actually softer than the stainless steel in the stock retainers. So what happens is that they deform. The benefit to Ti is that they're significantly lighter.
Old 06-08-2005, 07:19 PM
  #16  

 
hukares's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Mentor, OH
Posts: 734
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Titanium is softer than the hardened steel they use in retainers. They can deform but otherwise will wear from contact with the harder spring material. This is especially true if using spring dampers which looks like and basically is a flat spring for those that don't know, as the dampers tend to slowly cut through the retainer. As for the valve being harder to close under boost, I doubt there is a noteworthy difference. The pressure already filling the cylinder would also be pushing up on the valve at the same time. The only time you would need higher rate springs and a lighter valvetrain is when you increase rpms, put in a higher lift cam, and most important, when you put in a cam with increased ramp rates.
Old 06-08-2005, 10:43 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
JeremyM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: newport news, va
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

skip, have you mentioned your inquery with to dave yet. i know he was looking into different boost/pulley options in the near future if he keeps the car and im sure he has found some good information. you could always save up a little more, go ahead and do the full headwork and run an even smaller pulley. then you could achieve your hp goals w/out the spray. and since you will already be utilizing the EMS, tuning shouldnt be such an issue.

jeremy
Old 06-09-2005, 05:45 AM
  #18  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
FF2Skip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lewisville, TX
Posts: 48,203
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Thank you all for the responses. I'll proceed in accordance with staying at the stock rev limit... for now. I'll have to research all that needs to be done before bumping up to 9500 rpm. If someone knows of a post that I can be directed to or use specific words for the search function, lay it on me!
Old 06-09-2005, 06:47 AM
  #19  

 
Sideways's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: South of the pier, Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 9,030
Received 21 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

I went to a 9500 rpm redline one year ago. http://forums.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=215021
The car is running fine with probably a thousand forays into the 9300-9500 rpm range.

Due to the HP peak at 9250 rpm, I lowered the redline to 9350 soft, 9400 hard this year. I plan to go lower with added boost.

The retainers are Titanium, the springs are all Honda intakes (yellows.) The valves are Manley stainless steel (larger and lighter than stock.)
The head was ported, polished and blueprinted by Joe Alaniz.

The best thing about 9500 rpm is the sound. I'm currently running an Amuse and it gets everybodys attention with the sweet sound.
Old 06-09-2005, 09:21 AM
  #20  
Registered User
 
bigworm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: saratoga springs
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hey silvers2k4, have you lowered the vtec change over below 6k. If so how much? I also have an ap2, and I am thinking about FI. I could only imagine how fast 1st gear goes by with the different gears and lower redline and the blower. How do you like the ap2 w/ the charger. Was it worth it?

Plus, it is easier to drop the car out of vtec in the 1>2 shift, so lowering the engagement would help with that also.

sorry to jack the thread guys.


Quick Reply: Valve retainer/spring upgrade



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:56 AM.