S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Twincharged S

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-27-2007 | 11:26 AM
  #71  
s2khondas's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 758
Likes: 0
Default

i see him hunting down the 2js? if the motor is built maybe?
Old 08-27-2007 | 12:54 PM
  #72  
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 18
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by s2khondas,Aug 27 2007, 02:26 PM
i see him hunting down the 2js? if the motor is built maybe?
You mean 2jz?

If so, a centrifugal SC and small turbo is not going to make near the power to hunt down a built 2jz motor
Old 08-27-2007 | 01:12 PM
  #73  
Tyraid2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,454
Likes: 0
From: Boise, Idaho
Default

^^^
I think 2js was the plural form of 2jz,

as in many 2jz's, or all of the 2jz powered S2000s.

:End english lesson:
Old 08-27-2007 | 01:48 PM
  #74  
AirborneS2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Tyraid2K,Aug 27 2007, 01:12 PM
^^^
I think 2js was the plural form of 2jz,

as in many 2jz's, or all of the 2jz powered S2000s.

:End english lesson:
2j's does not equal plural form of 2JZ, it's being lazy and not taking the time to spell 2JZ's.
Old 08-27-2007 | 02:57 PM
  #75  
AusS2000's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,808
Likes: 14
From: Sydney
Default

Unless it's a really small quick spooling turbo I'm not sure I see the point. Maybe a GT25/28?

I'm running a GT3071R and it is spooled by 3500 and makes well over 400hp up top.

As for those saying the SC is being over spun by the turbo..... oh please. A centrifugal compressor is not designed to be driven by air through it's inlet so it will have very little effect no matter how much air the turbo is pumping.
Old 08-27-2007 | 06:30 PM
  #76  
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 18
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by Tyraid2K,Aug 27 2007, 04:12 PM
^^^
I think 2js was the plural form of 2jz,

as in many 2jz's, or all of the 2jz powered S2000s.

:End english lesson:
I is good at engrish!
Old 08-28-2007 | 09:44 AM
  #77  
RBC3's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 10,274
Likes: 0
From: Madison, AL
Default

Originally Posted by s2khondas,Aug 27 2007, 02:26 PM
i see him hunting down the 2js? if the motor is built maybe?
They are in the same city! They are both Bama owners.
Old 08-28-2007 | 10:05 AM
  #78  
slimjim8201's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: Gie
Default

Originally Posted by AusS2000,Aug 27 2007, 06:57 PM
Unless it's a really small quick spooling turbo I'm not sure I see the point. Maybe a GT25/28?

I'm running a GT3071R and it is spooled by 3500 and makes well over 400hp up top.

As for those saying the SC is being over spun by the turbo..... oh please. A centrifugal compressor is not designed to be driven by air through it's inlet so it will have very little effect no matter how much air the turbo is pumping.
I agree. I can see the logic in coupling a small roots or screw type positive displacement supercharger with a large turbocharger. The supercharger can be spun very quickly at lower RPM and then be either disengaged via a clutch or bypassed and allowed to "free-wheel" at higher RPM. After the supercharger is bypassed, the engine would flow enough air to have the turbo spooled. Best of both worlds, really.

This setup seams a little pointless to me. If a large turbo was used, then both compressors would only function well at higher engine speeds. If a medium sized turbo was used, there would still be little to no positive charge at low engine speeds. To gain low RPM boost, a very small turbo would be in order, with a very small turbine. The small turbine would limit air flow at higher engine speeds, hindering the whole setup unless an efficient turbine bypass was also implemented.

The whole thing has me asking "why?". A 2JZ S2000 even makes more sense to me
Old 08-28-2007 | 03:27 PM
  #79  
S2_PHENOMENON's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
Default

Wow! That is one crazy set-up.
Old 08-29-2007 | 03:35 AM
  #80  
rSx KinGz-!'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Default

i dont understand why s/c is needed for downlow wit a turbo spooling by 3500, i could see the need if it spooled by like 5-6k


Quick Reply: Twincharged S



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:18 PM.