S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

ScienceofSpeed releases supercharger system

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-11-2009 | 09:51 AM
  #321  
ryoga4523's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
Default

reviving an old post, how hard is it to install this system, and does it come with instructions?

And what are some of you guys' whp/tq expectations (with the setup you have currently running)
Old 03-11-2009 | 10:00 AM
  #322  
Flite's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,582
Likes: 0
From: middle of a corn field
Default

Originally Posted by rosscoe21,Mar 11 2009, 01:12 PM
Will the 16th ever get here? I am going ape crap.
You're lucky. I've got another week since I opted for the SL blower.
Old 03-11-2009 | 12:09 PM
  #323  
rosscoe21's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
From: Gray/Johnson City
Default

I thought about going with the sl blower but decided against it. Didn't want one more thing requiring fluid changes.
Old 03-11-2009 | 01:18 PM
  #324  
pinstriped06's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Default

mine wont be ready till the 4th :'( hey quick question. anyone that oped for the Kpro kit did you order the wideband o2? does it make it easyer to tune the car or does it actually provide you with more hp potential?
Old 03-11-2009 | 01:22 PM
  #325  
Flite's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,582
Likes: 0
From: middle of a corn field
Default

Originally Posted by rosscoe21,Mar 11 2009, 04:09 PM
I thought about going with the sl blower but decided against it. Didn't want one more thing requiring fluid changes.
My car gets about 5-7000 miles a year on it, so the fluid changes aren't that bad. If it was a daily, I think I would have gone with the standard blower as well.

I'm sure these blowers are very efficient, but I did think about the possibility of contaminants from the blower being introduced in the engine oil system. I know that's been proven to be a none issue, but I'm anal retentive.
Old 03-11-2009 | 01:28 PM
  #326  
pinstriped06's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Default

yea the whole reason i went with supercharger instead of turbo i hate the idea that theres another way for my to rob oil from the engine. just one more risk idk lol im paranoid haha
Old 03-11-2009 | 02:51 PM
  #327  
rosscoe21's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
From: Gray/Johnson City
Default

yeah, I dd mine so I thought it would be a better idea to go with the non sl.
Old 03-11-2009 | 04:50 PM
  #328  
DannyCoolBeans's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 687
Likes: 1
From: Miami, Fl.
Default

I went with the non sl too! Im not going to be tracking my car or 1/4 mile racing. Just for plain old fun!

Ok since the FMU is adjustable, would you have to adj it if i were to put on an intake and tp?
Old 03-11-2009 | 04:53 PM
  #329  
DannyCoolBeans's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 687
Likes: 1
From: Miami, Fl.
Default

As far as those "Crank Vents" go....is that a ya or naw for this sc system?
Old 03-12-2009 | 01:49 AM
  #330  
Enlightened's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Default

Can you tune the base level kit with a SAFC NEO? Would the FMU interfere with this piggyback?


Quick Reply: ScienceofSpeed releases supercharger system



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:24 PM.