S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

My turbo build list....

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-02-2008, 08:57 AM
  #11  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
AndyFloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by passmans2kny,Apr 2 2008, 08:46 AM
16 psi and race gas on stock compression, I'd be scared
Mase did like 22psi on a 3076R with 116octane C16. I thought it should be fine, but the fact remains that the engine is still 11:1 CR and thats pretty high for a turbo car. I know I can do 10-11 on pump 93. I might try 13-14psi on racegas and just increase the timing a little more to extract a little extra power. So you think 16psi on race gas stock CR is too much eh?

Thats why i posted this question...I wanna hear from you guys.
Old 04-02-2008, 09:24 AM
  #12  
Registered User

 
passmans2kny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: huntington long island
Posts: 5,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i understand its been done b4, but mase is the only one i have seen do this, knowing hes a great tuner from what i have heard im sure it can be done, just make sure u have a amazing tuner for this kind of set up, the tune will be everything
Old 04-02-2008, 09:48 AM
  #13  

 
JoeyBalls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 9,570
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

what about 10PSI with the Greddy?, thats what Im shooting for on Friday
Old 04-02-2008, 10:20 AM
  #14  
Registered User

 
passmans2kny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: huntington long island
Posts: 5,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

should be ok, whos tuning it?
Old 04-04-2008, 11:48 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
blkwidow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Paradise Hills / SD
Posts: 1,735
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You can run a walbro 255, big injectors without a AFPR? I'm not doubting you, I just come from DSMs. I realize they are two different cars but I know a little bit about turbos and fuel but I'm always still learning =)
Old 04-04-2008, 12:09 PM
  #16  

 
jwa4378's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes, you can run the larger injectors with the EMS and no FPR. FPR would be needed if the EMS did not already control injector duty cycles... similar to the Vortech fuel system (I believe).

Also, no need for Tru-Boost if you are running full EMS... you just need the solenoid, I believe the EMS has a built in controller (albeit electronic vs. manual, it allows multiple boost settings)... it would be needed if you were to only run the FIC unit or something like that...

If I am mistaken, let me know!

As far as the psi goes, the log manifold might hurt you a bit. The whole goal behind higher boost levels should be as low an intake charge temp as possible. Colder the charge the less likely the chance of pre-detonation. And, at those boost levels on stock CR, its all in the tune!

John
Old 04-04-2008, 09:23 PM
  #17  
Moderator

 
AusS2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Sydney
Posts: 30,811
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jwa4378,Apr 5 2008, 06:09 AM
Yes, you can run the larger injectors with the EMS and no FPR.
Just a slight correction for clarity.

With an EMS you still need a FPR. The stock one will do.

What you don't need is a rising rate FPR (RRFPR) such as the Comptech unit that replaces the OEM FPR or the Vortech unit which supplememnts it.
Old 04-05-2008, 12:23 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
blkwidow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Paradise Hills / SD
Posts: 1,735
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok I see now. Thanks guys for clearing that up. Us DSMers rarely ever use a full standalone so I don't know much about it.
Old 04-05-2008, 01:02 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
BoostedK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I ran similar but diff turbo.. my question why the log manifold? Why not the pfab tubular? Curious!

Thanks
Old 04-05-2008, 07:21 PM
  #20  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
AndyFloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BoostedK,Apr 5 2008, 01:02 PM
I ran similar but diff turbo.. my question why the log manifold? Why not the pfab tubular? Curious!

Thanks
well the log is a lot less likely to crack, and its easier to access bolts and whatnot with a log in there. I know the tubular is going to make more power but i have used log manifolds in the past on different cars and you can still make good power with a log. Who knows down the road i might go tubular but the log just makes sense right now.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
yzracer323
S2000 Forced Induction
4
03-20-2012 12:14 PM
bois2k
S2000 Forced Induction
38
04-07-2011 02:51 PM
riceball777
S2000 Forced Induction
39
03-17-2011 11:55 PM
ny1honda
S2000 Forced Induction
0
10-24-2009 05:19 PM
bigmos2k
S2000 Forced Induction
67
05-19-2008 11:15 AM



Quick Reply: My turbo build list....



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:23 PM.