S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Intake manifold

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-10-2009, 07:55 AM
  #31  
Registered User
 
ScorpionT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Apparently its still in testing, should be ready towards the end of the month. Im going to talk to my guys there and see about getting a couple before the official release date.
Old 02-10-2009, 03:57 PM
  #32  
Registered User
 
KewlWhip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 971
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ScorpionT,Feb 10 2009, 10:55 AM
Apparently its still in testing, should be ready towards the end of the month. Im going to talk to my guys there and see about getting a couple before the official release date.
Great! Thanks for the update.

-Chris
Old 02-10-2009, 05:05 PM
  #33  
Registered User
 
ninety2slow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hopefully the Magnus manifold doesn't "perform" like their manifolds for the 4G63
Old 02-10-2009, 05:57 PM
  #34  
Registered User

 
gt30r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ninety2slow,Feb 10 2009, 06:05 PM
Hopefully the Magnus manifold doesn't "perform" like their manifolds for the 4G63
I agree, "showpiece" lol
Old 02-12-2009, 10:15 AM
  #35  
Registered User
 
KewlWhip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 971
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ninety2slow,Feb 10 2009, 08:05 PM
Hopefully the Magnus manifold doesn't "perform" like their manifolds for the 4G63
I've heard that the 4G63 isn't a very free flowing engine, especially when compared to the F20C or F22C. One could draw the conclusion that a more free flowing engine would get better results from a more free flowing intake. The real questions are; will the Magnus intake flow better than the OEM Honda and if it does will the engine benefit from the additional flow (i.e. is there a need for more flow than the OEM manifold can deliver)?

-Chris
Old 02-12-2009, 10:25 AM
  #36  
Registered User
 
CarbonYellowJ's's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

For a ported head I can see a intake manifold with larger runners working beautifully. If done correctly the velocity stacks before the runners should help also.
Old 02-12-2009, 10:28 AM
  #37  
Registered User
 
ArinX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

in for updates
Old 02-12-2009, 02:38 PM
  #38  
Registered User
 
ScorpionT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KewlWhip,Feb 12 2009, 11:15 AM
I've heard that the 4G63 isn't a very free flowing engine, especially when compared to the F20C or F22C. One could draw the conclusion that a more free flowing engine would get better results from a more free flowing intake. The real questions are; will the Magnus intake flow better than the OEM Honda and if it does will the engine benefit from the additional flow (i.e. is there a need for more flow than the OEM manifold can deliver)?

-Chris
Hopefully we will see good results with the new manifold. Like you said, more free flowing benefits more(as long as the intake side is somewhat of a restriction).

I think the flaw in the old Magnus manifold was the lack of full radius velocity stacks. It did make power higher up, just not as much as one would expect. I think it would also do better for 30+psi applications. The new cast Magnus manifold is great though, much better than the old one.
Old 02-12-2009, 08:15 PM
  #39  
Registered User
 
tunedbycft's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Orlando,FL
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 00wreckedS,Jan 14 2009, 03:17 PM
are you sure its soon?

Yes, very soon! Im the one that is going to be testing it. i just got off the phone with Marco about some thing that we need to change on it, but other than that we are planning on having it done sometime by the end of March.

Stay tuned for more!

Fernando
Old 02-12-2009, 08:34 PM
  #40  
Registered User
 
tunedbycft's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Orlando,FL
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ninety2slow,Feb 10 2009, 06:05 PM
Hopefully the Magnus manifold doesn't "perform" like their manifolds for the 4G63
We have one on our SFWD Civic and we made 850whp with no problems. We were using a JG Edelbrok intake manifold and we switch to the Magnus Race Intake and the turbo spool up 1,000rpm sooner and we made like 70-80whp more through out the mid range power band.

That Intake makes tons of POWER!!!! Believe Marco doesn't sell something unless it makes power and we are very lucky to be working with them on another project like the CFT S2000 project! I can't wait to put it on my car....

Thanks for your time,

Fernando


Quick Reply: Intake manifold



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:34 AM.