S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Inline Pro Engine #3 - It's actually over this time.

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-03-2023 | 01:53 PM
  #21  
umair's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 104
Default

Originally Posted by Charper732
I wouldnt call what you're experiencing a build error, but it really needs to be torn down to see the pistons.

cylinder 3 sees more air because of the way the manifold is designed. If you put individual widebands on the cylinders youd see #3 runs leaner. This is why when people have issues 90% of the time its on #3.

Why yours only shows foreign debris on that one cylinder I cannot answer.

Is that a bored FRM block? Ive been building these for awhile. Just a suggestion, stay away from boring/honing FRM liners. I've never seen them last. Sleeve it or find a block with good bores.

But doesn't honda say they can be bored?
Old 08-03-2023 | 06:21 PM
  #22  
ForeverCar's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Oct 2022
Posts: 169
Likes: 30
Default

FRM bore is tricky. I am not even sure if the few that are capable of refinishing FRM bore are still around!

Sleeves, find a good stock block, or alternative coating (needs a bit more time to tell) are probably the only block options at the moment.

With so many variables, getting to the root causes of the failure might not be easy. But super important though.

If Jeff tuned the car, the tune likely isn’t the issue.
Old 08-03-2023 | 06:21 PM
  #23  
Car Analogy's Avatar
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,155
Likes: 1,497
Default

Originally Posted by Dizings2k

I also thought this could be foreign stuff into the motor but if it did some from upstream in the intake how did it possibly *only* effect cylinder 3?

Also the inside of the intake valves on the cylinder head are perfect. Zero signs of anything entering through there.
If the debris was just one solid object, then it would justbe a lottery which cylinder it'd end up in. Since cyl 3 gets more air because of im design, has higher odds to win this lottery.

It wouldn't necessarily leave any marks on valve as it passed through.
Old 08-04-2023 | 04:24 AM
  #24  
Dizings2k's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,139
Likes: 160
From: Johnstown, PA
Default

Here are the spark plug pics. Cylinder 3 is the dark one. As far as I can tell the plugs color and timing (outside of cyl 3) look perfect. Zero signs of detonation.






Old 08-04-2023 | 04:27 AM
  #25  
Dizings2k's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,139
Likes: 160
From: Johnstown, PA
Default

Originally Posted by Charper732
I wouldnt call what you're experiencing a build error, but it really needs to be torn down to see the pistons.

cylinder 3 sees more air because of the way the manifold is designed. If you put individual widebands on the cylinders youd see #3 runs leaner. This is why when people have issues 90% of the time its on #3.

Why yours only shows foreign debris on that one cylinder I cannot answer.

Is that a bored FRM block? Ive been building these for awhile. Just a suggestion, stay away from boring/honing FRM liners. I've never seen them last. Sleeve it or find a block with good bores.
Yes, these builds have always been a bored FRM block. Right now the motor is using stock crank, supposedly OEM crank bearings, inline pro rods, and CP pistons 10.6:1 that are somehow "coated" to be compatible with the FRM bore.

I'm in touch with Jeremy Allen who also recommended sleeving for what I'm looking to do. I'm going to be dropping the motor off to him for a sleeve/rebuild in a few weeks.
Old 08-04-2023 | 06:47 AM
  #26  
umair's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 104
Default

What was inline pros response to this?
Old 08-04-2023 | 07:16 AM
  #27  
bruthaboost's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 944
Likes: 66
From: Midland
Default

Originally Posted by Dizings2k
Yes, these builds have always been a bored FRM block. Right now the motor is using stock crank, supposedly OEM crank bearings, inline pro rods, and CP pistons 10.6:1 that are somehow "coated" to be compatible with the FRM bore.
This is news to me. I'm not a professional engine builder, but I'm currently building a spare block, and during my research of what pistons to use I found only Mahle *advertised* FRM friendly pistons.
Old 08-04-2023 | 08:49 AM
  #28  
Spoolin's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,474
Likes: 40
From: Sellersburg, IN
Default

Originally Posted by bruthaboost
This is news to me. I'm not a professional engine builder, but I'm currently building a spare block, and during my research of what pistons to use I found only Mahle *advertised* FRM friendly pistons.
Mahle pistons is what I have always heard were the only pistons to use in the OEM FRM bores. This has been known since I can remember, maybe since 2003 even. Has that changed? It was always evident that any other piston besides the Mahle being used in the OEM FRM bores had issues. I think this was due to Mahle being the only piston that strictly abided by what could be used with FRM bores. What that entails, I'm not positive on though.

I'm curious now if the use of the CP pistons has been the issue with this build all along, just like in the past.

Last edited by Spoolin; 08-04-2023 at 08:53 AM.
Old 08-05-2023 | 08:03 PM
  #29  
Charper732's Avatar
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 87
From: Atlanta, Ga
Default

Originally Posted by Spoolin
Mahle pistons is what I have always heard were the only pistons to use in the OEM FRM bores. This has been known since I can remember, maybe since 2003 even. Has that changed? It was always evident that any other piston besides the Mahle being used in the OEM FRM bores had issues. I think this was due to Mahle being the only piston that strictly abided by what could be used with FRM bores. What that entails, I'm not positive on though.

I'm curious now if the use of the CP pistons has been the issue with this build all along, just like in the past.
CP has a coating that they claim is compatible with FRM. That is what inlinepro uses as far as im aware. When the coating fails the cylinder will gawl up followed by rod bearing failure on that particular cylinder. Its hard to tell from your picture, but from what I can see it doesn't look like that is the case.

If those plugs are in order cylinder #2 looks a bit lean. Have your injectors flow tested.

Last edited by Charper732; 08-05-2023 at 08:14 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Spoolin (08-07-2023)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
floridawater
S2000 Under The Hood
3
07-27-2022 08:39 AM
usafstud
Car and Bike Talk
7
07-08-2011 10:18 AM
durtbikedude365
S2000 Under The Hood
7
11-25-2010 09:01 AM
passmans2kny
S2000 Forced Induction
81
11-08-2010 06:34 PM
cjb80
S2000 Under The Hood
17
01-28-2002 03:07 PM



Quick Reply: Inline Pro Engine #3 - It's actually over this time.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:23 AM.