how much hp is safe on 93 pump gas
#11
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 2,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
perfect actually i pulled the kit. it was on for over a year and look at these compression numbers...(look at the % difference between the highest and lowest, motor wasnt warm so the numbers themselves are lower than they would have been on a hot motor)
it's all in the tune. miller @ NRG tech FTW
it's all in the tune. miller @ NRG tech FTW
#12
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 2,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JuicedS2K,Sep 10 2010, 10:55 AM
Wow how's your motor holding up with no headgasket
#14
Originally Posted by m R g S r,Sep 10 2010, 02:08 PM
ask the people with the 3mm head gasket that, and im sure the response will be blown hg, overheating etc etc
I do agree though that 3mm headgaskets can be troublesome. I gave up on them after my 3rd one blew and went back to stock compression. Jeff Evans didn't want me going higher than 12psi on my setup as i wanted it comparatively reliable and I still made 448whp and 302ft/lbs.
#15
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 2,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's not really fair saying it blew on the dyno as a result of the stock hg or millers tune.
The motor was supercharged before I got it and the drive out there is probably what killed it (too much timing). After the motor started to see some boost (aka heat) that put the finishing touches on it.
And I went back to the same tuner, drove the same drive with the same timing and fuel map that the motor had when it let go on the dyno. I posted the timing maps and had Tony1 confirm that it was conservative and wouldn't have melted the pistons like that.
The motor was supercharged before I got it and the drive out there is probably what killed it (too much timing). After the motor started to see some boost (aka heat) that put the finishing touches on it.
And I went back to the same tuner, drove the same drive with the same timing and fuel map that the motor had when it let go on the dyno. I posted the timing maps and had Tony1 confirm that it was conservative and wouldn't have melted the pistons like that.
#16
500 on pump alone with no HG is awesome but don't think this is typical by any means
The majority of people on here needed meth or a 3mm to reach those levels on 93.
I make 490 on 93 with an HG and an efficient setup and that was on a dyno that reads uber high
With a properly sized turbo and a great mani/exhaust system I'd say your more likley to be around 400-425
The majority of people on here needed meth or a 3mm to reach those levels on 93.
I make 490 on 93 with an HG and an efficient setup and that was on a dyno that reads uber high
With a properly sized turbo and a great mani/exhaust system I'd say your more likley to be around 400-425
#20
Registered User
its an interesting question really. is there acertaing whp you are aiming for that will put you over the edge into something stronger as in build motor hg etc... or are yo ucurious to just see other peoples 93 octane numbers?
asking how much whp is possible on 93 is not the greates question, more like how much timing can you run before your 93 starts pinging and detonating. thats what really matters.
asking how much whp is possible on 93 is not the greates question, more like how much timing can you run before your 93 starts pinging and detonating. thats what really matters.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nemesisryder0627
S2000 Naturally Aspirated Forum
29
07-09-2014 10:43 AM
Sticky Dipstick
California - Southern California S2000 Owners
7
08-14-2005 03:27 PM
Bravnik
California - Bay Area S2000 Owners
16
01-05-2004 09:04 PM