s2000Junky

SC doesnt require quite the same level of free flowing a set up that a turbo does, they arent restricted in the same way, needing the same attention, however efficiency always wins. If you try and ram a 3" ball through a 2" opening you are going to have restriction and this builds a lot more heat, heat is the killer causing detonation to set in much earlier, limiting your boost amount or needing a cold fuel to help supress it. Sideways is a great example of what 91 OCT can do if you have a really efficient motor design with lower compression. Over 500whp on 91 at 20psi. Yet 91 on a log manny turbo may only see 375whp/13psi before detonation cant be tuned out.

Id say 12-14psi on 91 with a 1200 and stock motor is probably about where most tuners are going to feel comfortable max. Thats still going to be 400-420whp with that blower, so not bad at all. Throw on a decent water/meth injection kit and you could max out the blower speed making around 500whp.

desii

i dont like the fact that evasive didnt let you talk to their tuner. I understand them being busy and such, but they could have at least offered to ask for you and give back to you at a later time versus telling you a random number (as you stated, idk if it was a random number or not)

starrman

My 1200 was at 16psi with a 3.2" pulley....no issues?

s2000Junky

91 oct? and your at stock 11:1 compression?

volcomboy390

Yes ^ this... also interested.

And ya I asked to talk to him twice during that phone call and it was apparent I wasnt going to be able to speak to him.

s2k manic

yea that's b.s I run 9 psi on my f22 at 8500 rpm made 325 hp in 100f heat and I think 12 psi is a good compromise been thinking of putting a sneaky pete kit on the car for that little punch in the head when the new Camaros keep taunting me not sure if 320 hp will get it done and I still have the novi 1000 tuned on dyno dynamics so I think my power is about right

starrman

Stock motor, but missed the 91 octane...i ran 93.

s2000Junky

Stock motor, but missed the 91 octane...i ran 93.
[/quote]

Yeah that’s kind of what I thought. 93 is a huge improvement. We have 92 here in WA and I wouldn’t have too many reservations about running 15-16psi on that with stock compression. 91 is limiting.

volcomboy390

Stock motor, but missed the 91 octane...i ran 93.
[/quote]

Yeah that’s kind of what I thought. 93 is a huge improvement. We have 92 here in WA and I wouldn’t have too many reservations about running 15-16psi on that with stock compression. 91 is limiting.
[/quote]
Damn wish 93 was more available.....

Ok so you guys made up my mind. 12-14 psi it will be. What do you think go with the 3.6 inch... dont have much experience with any other boost level.

s2000Junky

Stock motor, but missed the 91 octane...i ran 93.
[/quote]

Yeah that’s kind of what I thought. 93 is a huge improvement. We have 92 here in WA and I wouldn’t have too many reservations about running 15-16psi on that with stock compression. 91 is limiting.
[/quote]
Damn wish 93 was more available.....

Ok so you guys made up my mind. 12-14 psi it will be. What do you think go with the 3.6 inch... dont have much experience with any other boost level.
[/quote]

No, too small a pulley. I'm making 13.5psi on a 3.8" pulley with this 1200. That's only revving it to 8400rpm and on a lower compression 9.6:1 motor. On stock compression you can count on seeing another 1-1.5psi with that pulley. Your probably best going with a 4"