gt4094r anyone?
#3
i built a car with that turbo - equal length manifold, when boost came on- and the key word is when (5700rmp), it was violent car pulled real hard, almost non driveable for a street car, no need for a turbo that big, many run the gt35r, with great success (500hp on stock motor on in-linepro log manifold) i like the 3076 - spools faster than the 35 and and still can get you to 500hp.
#5
Originally Posted by timg,May 28 2009, 07:17 PM
Lovefab ran a GT4088R for a while.
The GT4094R is a bigger turbo (on the compressor side). Most prefer either the GT4088R or GT4294R.
Tim
The GT4094R is a bigger turbo (on the compressor side). Most prefer either the GT4088R or GT4294R.
Tim
J. R.
#6
Our s2k put down 670rwhp on a 35r. the car is just nasty on the street. the weak link is the transmission though.
If you put a 4094r on....Can you afford the aftermarket transmission? 5-10k? because you will NEED this.
If you put a 4094r on....Can you afford the aftermarket transmission? 5-10k? because you will NEED this.
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by Peter@ISP,May 31 2009, 07:24 AM
ive tried gt4088 and gt4094 in different housings. i've found out that they make about 50hp more than gt35r and a lag similar to gt42.
#10
Originally Posted by AndyFloyd,May 31 2009, 10:57 AM
so basically its kinda pointless to use a 40R because its gonna lag similar to a 42R. So either use a GT35R for 650whp or go baller status with the 42R.