S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

F24 500hp, what's best turbo or SC ?

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-31-2012, 09:36 AM
  #1  

Thread Starter
 
Jiaim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default F24 500hp, what's best turbo or SC ?

Hello, have some questions, didn't dound any responses with the search engine.

what you guys recommand for this kind of setup

F24 (k1 h22/k24 rods, JE h22 pistons, accord k24 crank) 9.0:1, 8000 rpms

-> 6k price tag max


1. SOS supercharger setup with 1200 novi (RHD compatible?)

2. Stage 1 log turbo setup (fullblown, pfab...), which turbo (PTE5857?) (RHD compatible?)


which of those would yeld the best area under the curve for a street and twisty track toy?

What about reliability?

Let's the argument begin.

Thanks.
Old 01-31-2012, 09:40 AM
  #2  
Registered User

 
passmans2kny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: huntington long island
Posts: 5,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

equal length turbo manifold, something in the gt35r size
Old 01-31-2012, 10:29 AM
  #3  
Registered User

 
DFWs2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 14,614
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Gt35r bb would be an awesome turbo for that engine and those goals. I think you should try the PLM manifold if you are looking to stay pretty cheap. That manifold is t3, and then you can get a great deal on an awesome turbo by clicking the first link in my sig.

Sent using free Tapatalk - Android FTW
Old 01-31-2012, 10:36 AM
  #4  

 
Jin_SK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 750
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I've also got an F24, 88.5x97, 9.2 CR, custom tubular manifold feeding an AGP Zeta 3.2. I'm making 403whp, 309 tq on 91 and 10.7 psi. I've only been boosted for 3 months so I can't really comment on reliability, but so far as my DD it's been great. My redline was set at 7200 due to the extra stroke, so a 99mm stroke @8000 seems unfavorable in the long run.
Old 01-31-2012, 11:37 AM
  #5  

Thread Starter
 
Jiaim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

thanks for inputs !

are log mani that bad ? have read pretty good reviews on this forum, as this setup won't see more than 500 crank hp on 2.4 displacement.
Old 01-31-2012, 11:37 AM
  #6  
Registered User

 
DFWs2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 14,614
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

500 crank? you can hit that no problem with a log and a good turbo
Old 01-31-2012, 12:16 PM
  #7  

 
Jin_SK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 750
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

^^ If you're on a budget then I agree. I'm planning on getting a GTX3076 for better response, especially with the added displacement and still make plenty of power.
Old 01-31-2012, 12:16 PM
  #8  

Thread Starter
 
Jiaim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by DFWs2k
500 crank? you can hit that no problem with a log and a good turbo
no need for more for tracking, i want the best area under the curve, and i'm debatting between turbo vs sc.
Old 01-31-2012, 12:35 PM
  #9  

 
riceball777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Los angeles
Posts: 3,121
Received 74 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

turbos will always be better when it comes to max power and power under the curve and low end power


the only real advantage of a super charger is less heat and arguably more reliable
Old 01-31-2012, 01:47 PM
  #10  
Registered User

 
Torque Obsessed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Exactly what he said.


Quick Reply: F24 500hp, what's best turbo or SC ?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:04 AM.