E85 vs 93&meth
#11
Both have pros and cons, but I have to say water/meth has far less cons, it is so much more versatile. The one con to water/meth injection is it is one more thing that could fail, but are nullified if you choose to run fail safe measure (there are several ways to go there) Pros - Yes you can achieve equivalent octane as E85, you can in fact surpass it if you choose by the ratio to water you want to run and the size nozzle/nozzles you want to use to inject. Running on gas gives you much more efficient partial throttle running which is where you spend 95% of your driving, then you get all the benefits of E85/race fuel with the water/meth. The water % in the injection actually boost trq and removes heat better then any E85 or race fuel can depending on your calibration. You can get more then a 125-150 miles to a tank of gas, you dont have to worry about potential fuel system compromises and you dont have to deal with finding E85 stations. These are a few things off the top of my head.
#12
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Clarksville, Tn
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Both have pros and cons, but I have to say water/meth has far less cons, it is so much more versatile. The one con to water/meth injection is it is one more thing that could fail, but are nullified if you choose to run fail safe measure (there are several ways to go there) Pros - Yes you can achieve equivalent octane as E85, you can in fact surpass it if you choose by the ratio to water you want to run and the size nozzle/nozzles you want to use to inject. Running on gas gives you much more efficient partial throttle running which is where you spend 95% of your driving, then you get all the benefits of E85/race fuel with the water/meth. The water % in the injection actually boost trq and removes heat better then any E85 or race fuel can depending on your calibration. You can get more then a 125-150 miles to a tank of gas, you dont have to worry about potential fuel system compromises and you dont have to deal with finding E85 stations. These are a few things off the top of my head.
thanks, i know there are multiple types of failsafes depending on what system you run. Also i read you can run the signal to your ems as a failsafe also, using one of the inputs like nitrous or something cant remember. Ill be running haltech or AEM when i finish getting all my parts in.
#13
Originally Posted by s2000Junky' timestamp='1332214807' post='21525180
Both have pros and cons, but I have to say water/meth has far less cons, it is so much more versatile. The one con to water/meth injection is it is one more thing that could fail, but are nullified if you choose to run fail safe measure (there are several ways to go there) Pros - Yes you can achieve equivalent octane as E85, you can in fact surpass it if you choose by the ratio to water you want to run and the size nozzle/nozzles you want to use to inject. Running on gas gives you much more efficient partial throttle running which is where you spend 95% of your driving, then you get all the benefits of E85/race fuel with the water/meth. The water % in the injection actually boost trq and removes heat better then any E85 or race fuel can depending on your calibration. You can get more then a 125-150 miles to a tank of gas, you dont have to worry about potential fuel system compromises and you dont have to deal with finding E85 stations. These are a few things off the top of my head.
thanks, i know there are multiple types of failsafes depending on what system you run. Also i read you can run the signal to your ems as a failsafe also, using one of the inputs like nitrous or something cant remember. Ill be running haltech or AEM when i finish getting all my parts in.
#14
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Clarksville, Tn
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
might just roll with that option, aem kits are around 450 but any worthwile kit should have the option to link up with the ems for failsafe options.
#15
I'd probably steer you towards a better quality kit from Snow performance or Devils own. I was never fully happy with the AEM kit, to compromised and their progressive controllers are cheap and unreliable.
#17
Registered User
I apologize if this is off topic or in the wrong direction of this thread but to make 450 you can just run 93 by itself. There seem to be a good number of people making 450 on 93 with no meth. I vote e85 over 93 & meth if you have pumps in your area. Availability seems to be one of the major reasons more of us dont run e85 :-(
#18
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Clarksville, Tn
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yea your right, i would just like to easily make 450 and be able to make over 500 with just a few more lbs of boost without really pushing it on pumpgas.