DSport Mag: Honda S2000 Forced Induction Shootout
07-22-2009, 08:00 AM
#42
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MrSmith,Jul 22 2009, 05:58 AM
What exactly do you think those kits would put down at 9 psi on 91 octane through a stock cat and exhaust?
"We have dyno tested this manifold [ELT] to produce an approximate 22whp per psi on a journal bearing T3/60-1 Turbocharger. Our test car with a Invidia 60mm cat-back exhaust netted 313whp on 5psi with a 11.1 Air/Fuel using a Dyno Dynamics dynometer."
07-22-2009, 09:51 AM
#44
Registered User
[QUOTE=Boofster,Jul 22 2009, 09:31 PM]It would have been nice to see all systems at 10psi.
Running almost 40% more boost is like bringing a sword to a knife fight.
Running almost 40% more boost is like bringing a sword to a knife fight.
07-22-2009, 09:59 AM
#45
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Boofster,Jul 22 2009, 09:31 AM
It would have been nice to see all systems at 10psi.
None of the other components being the same really matters.
None of the other components being the same really matters.
07-22-2009, 01:33 PM
#46
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MrSmith,Jul 22 2009, 05:58 AM
What exactly do you think those kits would put down at 9 psi on 91 octane through a stock cat and exhaust?
PFAB claims 22psi per pound of boost on their manifold.
So if we take 209whp baseline and then add 9 psi of boost to that with pfab's off the shelf 60-1 turbo we arrive at give or take 400whp. And thats about right in line with what people have been making with that manifold. SC seems like it had an advantage in this contest, im a turbo guy. lol
07-22-2009, 02:07 PM
#48
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by AndyFloyd,Jul 21 2009, 02:16 PM
full-race shoulda showed up....might have been a different outcome then. haha
j/k