S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

400whp s2k quarter mile compared to other cars!

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-28-2013, 09:04 PM
  #31  
Registered User
 
s2kt3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Phill24
so a domestic car never break? cause i know alot of domestics that go to the track and break shit..i have a 87 gnx timing chain broke and f@#ked the motor car been sitting in my back yard since....If u didnt realize joeys car wasnt always in the shop because he broke something hes one of the only ppl i know of with 50+ passes on a STOCK trans that never broke, dont remember him breaking the STOCK diff either to think of it the only time his car really been to the shop is when he bent a valve..so how/when is his car always in the shop?

Not about the fact it doesn't break...the fact that almost completely stock they run fast times ..... The reliability of the stock components is way better then that of the s
Old 12-29-2013, 05:55 PM
  #32  
Registered User

 
beaudin223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by s2kt3
Originally Posted by Phill24' timestamp='1388284097' post='22941284
so a domestic car never break? cause i know alot of domestics that go to the track and break shit..i have a 87 gnx timing chain broke and f@#ked the motor car been sitting in my back yard since....If u didnt realize joeys car wasnt always in the shop because he broke something hes one of the only ppl i know of with 50+ passes on a STOCK trans that never broke, dont remember him breaking the STOCK diff either to think of it the only time his car really been to the shop is when he bent a valve..so how/when is his car always in the shop?

Not about the fact it doesn't break...the fact that almost completely stock they run fast times ..... The reliability of the stock components is way better then that of the s
yes but the S have 200whp oem so the part are made for that
Old 12-29-2013, 06:04 PM
  #33  
Registered User

 
redboost10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Woodburn, OR
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

there are not a lot of factory cars that come with 2hp per cubic inch. pretty impressive.
Old 12-30-2013, 04:43 PM
  #34  
Registered User
 
d-bo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

it is mostly because of 60' times. for every .1 faster your 60ft is, USUALLY your 1/4 ET will be 2x that

for example..


in my evo i ran a 7.0 1/8th @ 100mph with a 1.6 60ft.

i went to another track and ran a 1.8 60' which equated to a 7.5 1/8th ET which equated to a 11.4 @ 127 . i was pissed !!! Lol
Old 12-31-2013, 09:30 AM
  #35  
Registered User
 
That Guy 1987's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wow, I'm surprised no one has mentioned it yet. It's because you have a centrifugal blower and not a roots blower like a mustang. Your centrifugal blower doesn't even make full boost till redline where as my 6266 makes full boost at 4800. Make 400 in a turbo charge car and it's night and day. OP I had an SOS kit and sold it a month after upgrading the pulley because it still didn't pull nearly as hard as my friends turbo s. Put a turbo in your car and it may be a different story for them. You can make 500whp in your S/C s and it will still be quick not fast.
Old 12-31-2013, 10:32 AM
  #36  

 
riceball777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Los angeles
Posts: 3,121
Received 74 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by That Guy 1987
Wow, I'm surprised no one has mentioned it yet. It's because you have a centrifugal blower and not a roots blower like a mustang. Your centrifugal blower doesn't even make full boost till redline where as my 6266 makes full boost at 4800. Make 400 in a turbo charge car and it's night and day. OP I had an SOS kit and sold it a month after upgrading the pulley because it still didn't pull nearly as hard as my friends turbo s. Put a turbo in your car and it may be a different story for them. You can make 500whp in your S/C s and it will still be quick not fast.
I agree. The powerband of a s2000 with a centrifugal supercharger is horrible.


The main problem with the s2000 is the launch and 60 ft times. With my evo I made 1.7 60 ft times all day long with out even trying and I was running 7.7 in the 1/8 mile at 91mph. This was with basic street tires and race gas. With my s2000 I struggle to run faster than mid 8's in the 1/8 mile and that's with a 94mph trap on straight pump gas. It's hard to get into the 1's for 60 ft with out drag radials or slicks. With the s2000 you really need slicks to get a decent pass a and. Decent time.
Old 01-01-2014, 05:47 AM
  #37  
Registered User

 
PoonSlayer69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Their 1.8 sixty for vs you 2.2 make all the difference. Dont get crazy, slap on dr and launch at 8k. who cares if it beats you from a dead stop. Thats pretty much the only thing those cars are good for. From a roll race the s2000 will lay waste on them.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
volcomboy390
Inland Empire S2000 Owners
9
02-23-2013 08:34 AM
fallen612
S2000 Racing and Competition
11
02-14-2010 01:41 PM
Envied
Ohio S2000 Club
4
07-30-2007 05:30 AM
9kFever
California - Southern California S2000 Owners
45
02-08-2007 02:34 PM
Krisko
S2000 Talk
8
06-07-2003 06:07 PM



Quick Reply: 400whp s2k quarter mile compared to other cars!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:37 AM.