03suzuka...s2000

So I have been wanting to get new tires and an alignment. Its my daily driver but want a somewhat ag gressive alignment thats not gunna eat thrumy tires much more than OEM. Im wanting to go with a little more camber so I can fit 255's in the rear. I might go with a re-barel on my front wheels so the fronts will be 17x9.5 +55 to match the rear. Or is that too aggressive in the front? My car already has a basic roll/ no pull all around.with the bumper tab relocated

But for now my setup is 17x8 +43 w/225/45- 17x9.5 +55. W/245/40 lowered so there is about 1 finger gap between tire and wheel well

What would be a good alignment for this? Because my car seems to be a little dull while handling compared to when I first got it.and compared to my friends S2000. When I first got my car I got a bit of oversteer compared to the pretty bad understeer im getting now

03suzuka...s2000

Nobody has there own alignment specs they like for the s?

MMisencik157

I would go -1.5 camber all around, 0 toe front and rear... or up to 1/16" toe in in the rear (save your tires), and max caster.

03suzuka...s2000

What would max caster do?

MMisencik157

helps out with stability

RaulChavez

I have -1.5 camber up front with zero toe. In rear I have -2.5 camber with .2 toe in each side.

If your worry about tire life I say stay with -1.5 camber like said above and stay below .1 toe in rear.

RedCelica

-1.8f -2.0r
0 toe f .15 total toe r
max caster

I love my specs, car rotates and tires wear evenly

Croc

anyway - don't do zero rear toe - it's good for drifting not for stability.

MMisencik157

Hes not talking about tracking the car so why not get a little more tire life? You would never notice the difference when driving on the street or highway.

Croc

you don't need to be at rack to do fast turns.
too risky IMOand no no for the non expert driving.