Modifying Bilstein PSS/PSS9 to fit 60mm or 65mm springs
#11
What's your view on the ideal / maximum rate that the stock PSS valving can take? I understand they're overdamped for the stock PSS springs (345# front, 285# rear)... I am piecing together a more street-friendly set up (relative to yours), and trying to choose the best rates without revalving:
1. 9kg/mm (504#) front with 8kg/mm (448#) rear
2. 8kg/mm (448#) front with 7kg/mm (392#) rear
3. For even more front bias: 8kg/mm (448#) front with 345# rear (the front PSS spring)
1. 9kg/mm (504#) front with 8kg/mm (448#) rear
2. 8kg/mm (448#) front with 7kg/mm (392#) rear
3. For even more front bias: 8kg/mm (448#) front with 345# rear (the front PSS spring)
When you go too high with the spring rates, you'll start to feel a disconnect between the chassis and the contours in the road. My compression valving feels great with the springs I have. The rebound...not so much. As I go over undulations in the road, the low rebound damping allows the wheels to drop and support weight quickly, which gives the chassis a floating feeling. When it settles all is well and good, but there is an iffy transient that occurs over undulations. In auto-x or track lapping, they feel OK on smooth surfaces.
Revalving isn't too expensive, if you want to run higher rate springs. I had mine revalved for ~$60 a piece from a builder in North Carolina. Don't forget shipping costs when considering this... ~$50 each way. As I mentioned earlier, I would add about 150 lbs to the rebound curves (@ 3in/sec) for my dampers, if I were going to do it again. I opted to choose my own specs as a bit of a science project, but should have gone with something more along the lines of what the builder was suggesting. Live and learn...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
//steve\\
Member S2000 Classifieds and For Sale
23
01-09-2012 09:16 PM