danio

no GT3 no care.

sicknastyap1

shadowz

Lol just hurry back

Was never flush enough

danio

^ thats ging right there lol!

i2ice

Oh you cool kids with your concave te's ..I'm pretty damn jealous. Isnt there a special higer offset size that they concaved at. Something like 18x10.5 +43? I remember a white ap2 with white TE's I think it could have even been Damio posting a test fit picture. Also I know that there was a Guy running some ce's like that aswell, 9.5 or w.e. bit I'm sure they're discontiuned now.

B18C5-Eg6

So I need a GT3 with concave TEs??

ShadowZ car is always GING!!

shadowz

More like lop sop

S2tripleO

What's even better is almost every car there that has concave TE's is Canadian! We <3 us some concave TE's, good work fellas

Oh, and what's up Kent, glad to see you still around here bro, you back in an S yet?

TheChazz

Wow, lot of cars I really like... a lot of cars I don't. Seems a lot of people lost sight of the idea behind a car and push a single idea so far it becomes the subject of the build. Hopefully its just a phase and dies out soon. I love stance, and I love function. The rule is actually Form + Function NOT Form>Function. This is just my opinion, however I really do think thought should be into it a little more. What good is a car you cant drive without definitely destroying? Just my 2cents.

All that aside, my final product before its sold:
18x9 +22 with 225/35/18 Front and 18x10 +24 with 275/40/18
Full lock to lock, no rubbing, 100% flush and the rear can hold a business card. Not to sound to arrogant, but "thats how its done"
And before the argument takes place that it has to rub in the rear, please observe the video proof at 1:22:
http://vimeo.com/28698474

BawseS2k

The last page was full of win. Makes me want to go back to Volks asap