Official "Official" Forum All your "Official" threads!

Official Flush/hella flush(STANCE FTW) S2 THREAD

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-13-2013, 09:39 AM
  #10551  
Registered User
 
Unappreciated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

which company has the smallest sidewalls for 255s? i ordered a set of 17x10 +45 CE28 squared and i want it to look flushed and stances but not meaty or hellaflush...
Old 08-13-2013, 10:16 AM
  #10552  
Registered User
 
Kyle is raaddd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Marble Falls, Tx
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

17x10 +45 is going to be hard to do without looking aggressive.
My setup is 18x9.5 +44 all around, which isn't crazy, but half an inch is quite a bit.

Name:  HoodRatKYLEISRAADDD_zps289e60d2.jpg
Views: 266
Size:  288.4 KB
Old 08-13-2013, 01:08 PM
  #10553  

 
Dreaming_S2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 3,195
Received 28 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Unappreciated
which company has the smallest sidewalls for 255s? i ordered a set of 17x10 +45 CE28 squared and i want it to look flushed and stances but not meaty or hellaflush...
I'd probably do the Bridgestone RE11A if you wanted the most stretch/round sidewall at that tire size. Otherwise I'd go with the ZII like KBB has.

Originally Posted by Kyle is raaddd
17x10 +45 is going to be hard to do without looking aggressive.
My setup is 18x9.5 +44 all around, which isn't crazy, but half an inch is quite a bit.
^Not true. 10j +45 would be much easier than your setup.

It's only 5.3mm more poke on the front, and the extra stretch of the 10j makes it pretty darn simple. Offset determines where the center of the tire sits, and with a 17" wheel he's got a little more clearance because of the angle and extra height of the tire on a 255/40/17 (compared to 255/35/18 on your setup). Just take a look at KBB's car.
Old 08-13-2013, 01:48 PM
  #10554  
Registered User
 
Unappreciated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kyle is raaddd
17x10 +45 is going to be hard to do without looking aggressive.
My setup is 18x9.5 +44 all around, which isn't crazy, but half an inch is quite a bit.


ur +44 offset is concaved??? didnt know they made +44 in concave face...but overall do u have a closer front-side shot so i can see how much poke it is? thanks
Old 08-13-2013, 01:51 PM
  #10555  
Registered User
 
Unappreciated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dreaming_S2k
Originally Posted by Unappreciated' timestamp='1376415596' post='22722074
which company has the smallest sidewalls for 255s? i ordered a set of 17x10 +45 CE28 squared and i want it to look flushed and stances but not meaty or hellaflush...
I'd probably do the Bridgestone RE11A if you wanted the most stretch/round sidewall at that tire size. Otherwise I'd go with the ZII like KBB has.

Originally Posted by Kyle is raaddd
17x10 +45 is going to be hard to do without looking aggressive.
My setup is 18x9.5 +44 all around, which isn't crazy, but half an inch is quite a bit.
^Not true. 10j +45 would be much easier than your setup.

It's only 5.3mm more poke on the front, and the extra stretch of the 10j makes it pretty darn simple. Offset determines where the center of the tire sits, and with a 17" wheel he's got a little more clearance because of the angle and extra height of the tire on a 255/40/17 (compared to 255/35/18 on your setup). Just take a look at KBB's car.
for comfort and performance, which would u go for? RE11A or ZII?
Old 08-13-2013, 11:24 PM
  #10556  

 
_meh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by K.Shift
Originally Posted by _meh' timestamp='1375867559' post='22711193
[quote name='RickyBobbyChan' timestamp='1375614164' post='22705656']


Looks great! Specs?
8+20, 9+20
Set up is wayy to cleann.
what size tires are you running in the rear?
[/quote]
thanks man i'm running 215/40 in the back I wish I went 205/40 tho
Old 08-14-2013, 04:27 AM
  #10557  

 
Dreaming_S2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 3,195
Received 28 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Unappreciated
for comfort and performance, which would u go for? RE11A or ZII?
RE11A for sure.
Old 08-14-2013, 11:28 AM
  #10558  
Registered User

 
JayJones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

18x8.5+35 in the front, on 215/40/18, right now there's an inch gap with no rubbing in the front. I have no roll in the front.
Can i get away with another inch drop to achieve no wheel gap, running camber, and no roll? I want to leave my front fenders stock.

Name:  IMG_0062.jpg
Views: 243
Size:  114.0 KB

Will be rolling the rear fenders this weekend so i can drop it back down to where it was. I think if i lower the rear it will even out the front more and make it appear to be lower as well.

picture for reference.
Old 08-14-2013, 02:16 PM
  #10559  
Registered User
 
Kyle is raaddd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Marble Falls, Tx
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dreaming_S2k
^Not true. 10j +45 would be much easier than your setup.

It's only 5.3mm more poke on the front, and the extra stretch of the 10j makes it pretty darn simple. Offset determines where the center of the tire sits, and with a 17" wheel he's got a little more clearance because of the angle and extra height of the tire on a 255/40/17 (compared to 255/35/18 on your setup). Just take a look at KBB's car.
Okay I see what you're saying.

Originally Posted by Unappreciated
ur +44 offset is concaved??? didnt know they made +44 in concave face...but overall do u have a closer front-side shot so i can see how much poke it is? thanks
Yeah, they're rotas, btw, if you didn't notice.

I went digging through my photobucket, this is the best photo I could find that shows front fitment.
Name:  2A225174-996A-4A31-B97E-0F98BA73020D-2599-000001096A649980_zpsb8b3422e.jpg
Views: 201
Size:  186.3 KB
Old 08-14-2013, 07:08 PM
  #10560  
Registered User
 
Unappreciated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kyle is raaddd
Originally Posted by Dreaming_S2k' timestamp='1376428135' post='22722516
^Not true. 10j +45 would be much easier than your setup.

It's only 5.3mm more poke on the front, and the extra stretch of the 10j makes it pretty darn simple. Offset determines where the center of the tire sits, and with a 17" wheel he's got a little more clearance because of the angle and extra height of the tire on a 255/40/17 (compared to 255/35/18 on your setup). Just take a look at KBB's car.
Okay I see what you're saying.

Originally Posted by Unappreciated
ur +44 offset is concaved??? didnt know they made +44 in concave face...but overall do u have a closer front-side shot so i can see how much poke it is? thanks
Yeah, they're rotas, btw, if you didn't notice.

I went digging through my photobucket, this is the best photo I could find that shows front fitment.
hahaha i couldnt tell from the previous pics...but thanks for the pic! looks hell clean bro


Quick Reply: Official Flush/hella flush(STANCE FTW) S2 THREAD



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:17 AM.