Official Enkei RPF1 Thread PT 2.
#3001
You know we've had the conversation many times Steve lol, and I agree with you. I actually have more room up front than out back right now, and that's really the only reason I'd go back to 9 +45. My alignment specs in the rear are not ideal currently, but since I've recently been able to dd a different vehicle I haven't really been too concerned about it.
#3003
Registered User
#3004
Guys can't find that much info on the 17x10+38 fitment for the rear?
Is a flush roll, tab relocation and 2.5 degree of camber sufficient enough for the fitment with say 1 finger gap?
If not I was thinking of get the 17x10+38 and getting the wheel machined down to a +58 or so??
Thought please?
Is a flush roll, tab relocation and 2.5 degree of camber sufficient enough for the fitment with say 1 finger gap?
If not I was thinking of get the 17x10+38 and getting the wheel machined down to a +58 or so??
Thought please?
#3006
What's more baffling is why Enkei won't make a 10 +44. If they took the same manufacturing process of their 9.5 +38 and added a half inch of backspacing, it would be 10 +44.
#3009
[/quote]
Do you think that 255 all around would have rubbing issues in the front with that exact wheel/tire setup?
I have 1" drop and will have front camber set to max, which I think is -2.5.
Thanks,
Andre