Official Enkei RPF1 Thread PT 2.
#171
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: los angeles
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rubn1out4GudLuk,Jul 7 2010, 02:27 PM
Do they have rpf1's offered in that size???
My rears are close with the 17x9 1/2 +38...just a little more aggressive than the 17x9 +35(if they offer that).
My rears are close with the 17x9 1/2 +38...just a little more aggressive than the 17x9 +35(if they offer that).
car looks nice.
tnt
#172
A 17x9 +35 is more aggressive than 17x9.5 +38 in terms of fitting the wheels. Yes the 9.5 is wider but the offset determines where the center of the tire sits so on the 9.5s it's 3mm more inward than the 9 +35. The very outside of the rim is going to be out farther on the 9.5 but you'd have to be super slammed for it to become a problem.
#174
Originally Posted by //steve\\,Jul 8 2010, 07:20 AM
A 17x9 +35 is more aggressive than 17x9.5 +38 in terms of fitting the wheels. Yes the 9.5 is wider but the offset determines where the center of the tire sits so on the 9.5s it's 3mm more inward than the 9 +35. The very outside of the rim is going to be out farther on the 9.5 but you'd have to be super slammed for it to become a problem.
Either way, it's going to be very very similar fit if you stick to 255's mostly because on the 9.5 it'll stretch a tad more (just a hair), where it'll be pretty square on the 9.
I see what you're saying by where the center of the tire sits, but in this case it's so close I doubt either way would be much difference.
#177
Originally Posted by Dreaming_S2k,Jul 8 2010, 07:45 AM
A little confused by your post. If my calculations are correct, the 9.5 +38 is 3mm more aggressive on the front spacing, and 9mm more aggressive on the back spacing (which doesn't matter anyway, there is still plenty of space)
Either way, it's going to be very very similar fit if you stick to 255's mostly because on the 9.5 it'll stretch a tad more (just a hair), where it'll be pretty square on the 9.
I see what you're saying by where the center of the tire sits, but in this case it's so close I doubt either way would be much difference.
Either way, it's going to be very very similar fit if you stick to 255's mostly because on the 9.5 it'll stretch a tad more (just a hair), where it'll be pretty square on the 9.
I see what you're saying by where the center of the tire sits, but in this case it's so close I doubt either way would be much difference.
You are right though that the extra .5" of the rim will just barely stretch the tire some which always does help make them fit.
#178
Originally Posted by Leo Gets,Jul 8 2010, 05:35 AM
here's my contribution for thread2
They look really like a really skinny tire. All around actually.
#179
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Driver's seat
Posts: 1,440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mintifresh,Jul 8 2010, 01:13 PM
What are the specs again? Tire size included.
They look really like a really skinny tire. All around actually.
They look really like a really skinny tire. All around actually.
r 17x9.5 +38 245/35
tires ended up being shorter than I wanted. Next set will be 40 series