Official "Official" Forum All your "Official" threads!

Official Enkei RPF1 Thread PT 2.

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-06-2011, 09:55 PM
  #1041  
Registered User

 
Stephenopoly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NorCal
Posts: 9,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hellspare
For some reason it looks like that front tire would completely destroy that fender when it compresses. 17x9.5 +38 is pretty damn aggressive, but why does the tire poke out so much?
Yeah it does look that way, but it doesn't. The tire tucks underneath the fender perfectly when the suspension compresses. Since I am already max camber in the front I'll need a camber kit to tuck the tire in more. I'm also considering widening the fenders even more.
Old 03-07-2011, 05:31 AM
  #1042  
Registered User
 
dnpbakon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Name:  96e7a064.jpg
Views: 626
Size:  219.7 KB
Old 03-07-2011, 05:40 AM
  #1043  
Registered User
 
Corey Maurer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Gansevoort, NY
Posts: 3,401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ordering down force fenders and ASM over fenders at the end of the month
Old 03-07-2011, 07:35 AM
  #1044  

 
Dreaming_S2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 3,194
Received 28 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by So_Tits
It understeers and oversteers. Im not sure the exact alignment specs, I just put them as far negative as I could while keeping them the same. Im not worried about rolling the fenders, dropping the car, etc. It just seems like it's only going to put in more camber, wear my tires out faster, and reduce my handling even more...

Also, Im running 255's in the rear.

Im not sure I've heard of pulling the fenders...seems like an interesting idea. I'll ask our body shop about it.
Did you adjust the alignment yourself? I've got no clue regarding your experience so forgive me if I mention things you already know, but adjusting camber in this car affects toe. Have you had your toe settings checked? The car would definitely be all over the place if your toe was off. I do know for a fact that alot of race alignments run -3 camber up front, so that's the least of your worries. As far as the rear, all I can really say is that I've run as much as -4 in the rear, and it seems to be just fine. I'd really get the toe settings checked. Not just total toe, but how it is relative to the car too. Your total toe could be 0, and the rears are still both pointing say, left.

As far as the front, if you don't pull some, you're going to get some poke. The s2k has alot of camber gain, so it should tuck as suspension compresses, but just sitting there, if the fronts aren't flared or pulled, that's just what it is.

The term "fender pull" is a little misleading. If you're using a fender rolling tool, really what you're doing is making the tool push the angle of the fender out some. For the rears with the wheel size you have, the biggest area of concern is actually not even the top of the fender radius, but actually where the fender meets the rear bumper, along with the leading edge of the bumper and where the bumper bolt attaches to the fender (the upper one, underneath) The sheet metal in the rear is pretty stiff, but it's very do-able to make it work. The front fenders are another story, they're very thin and easy to make very wavy if you're not careful.

I really want to get some decent shots of my car, and I'm working on it soon, once I do I'll get some shots up. I've got 17x9.5 +38 all around now, with 245 fronts and 255 rears.
Old 03-07-2011, 10:32 AM
  #1045  
Registered User
 
mlam81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ugadogs_11
17X9 SBC + a little rain and a lot of brake dust!

Any side shots of the car?
Old 03-07-2011, 05:20 PM
  #1046  
Registered User

 
Tony_05s2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

few bad phone pics, need coils to be able to go lower but for now its how it sits.


Name:  Unnamed.jpg
Views: 585
Size:  29.2 KB
Name:  IMG00305-20110307-1417.jpg
Views: 659
Size:  38.5 KB
Name:  IMG00304-20110307-1417.jpg
Views: 669
Size:  48.0 KB
Old 03-08-2011, 12:58 AM
  #1047  
Registered User
 
dezeahp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

anyone running 9.5 +38 up front with a 225/40 tire? would love to see pics
Old 03-08-2011, 01:16 AM
  #1048  
Registered User
 
dezeahp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

235/40 * woops
Old 03-08-2011, 03:37 AM
  #1049  
Registered User
 
dnpbakon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dezeahp
235/40 * woops
I'm running a 235/40 on a 10+38 up front of this helps
Name:  3a48f7ce.jpg
Views: 615
Size:  134.0 KB
Old 03-08-2011, 04:21 AM
  #1050  

 
//steve\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: ATL
Posts: 10,465
Likes: 0
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

I've said it numerous times and people don't seem to believe it but the 9.5 +38s are significantly more work to fit than the 9 +45s.

Dreaming_s2k said it too. The part that you need the most clearance on is where the quarter panel and rear bumper come together. When I put the 9.5 +38s on my car I kept going back and shaving more bumper down and and trying to pull the quarters more and it just kept rubbing. Only then did I realize that it's that joint that was causing all the rubbing.

If/when I get another s2k I won't be getting another set of 9.5 +38s.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:21 AM.