smegma

 

Correlation does not equal causation, agreed. Just try to get a board to signoff on exposing an equal number circ/uncirc of randomly selected males with 3 stds. Not to mention, oh yea, medical-legal ethics.

Don't conflate different studies. The citation was the UK attack on the US study. The hispanic/black issues is likely due to exposure rates AND hygiene, AND circ., AND access to medical care, AND education, compared to whites.

Let's look at the mechanism(s) for the route of infection...uncleaned foreskins host almost ideal conditions for STDs. Cleaned foreskins are significantly better, but still worse than no foreskin. Why? Moisture, food, and direct access to mucosal membranes...

The brit assumption of eventual exposure is true, eventually, if the exposure rate is high enough. Unlikely in heteros.

Both partners should take care of infections, if they even know they are infected. Herp and HPV are sometimes very difficult to tell in women.

Finally, the HPV vaccine is not effective against all strains, with appx 30% still likely to get cervical cancer, and it doesn't work against existing infections.

So in Africa, where they don't have the 350 USD for the vaccine, limited medical care for any kind of treatment, and all you have to do is remove a vestigial flap...do the cut.

 

I call

Keep it clean down there and wrap your tool, and you're good to go.

Considering that circumcision rates among gentiles are very low in the rest of the world, you'd think that HIV, herpes, and cervical cancer would be spreading like wildfire everywhere else.

 

Interesting and funny take on it.

Would a better study include only Jews and white unsniped gentiles?

 

You could almost do a pie chart on the number of circumsized S2000 owners from this thread...LMAO!

https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.ph...ic=659389&st=0

 

Hahaha, nice.

Holy crap. That tread is made of 1 part win to 1 part fail.