Calculus help
#1
Calculus help
Hey!
It's been years since I've done calculus and can't believe I can't remember how to do something like this.
Can anyone help?
I assume the directions would be to solve for "x".
ln(x+4) - ln(x+2) = ln(x)
Using some of the properties, couldn't you rewrite that like this:
ln [ (x+4) / (x+2) ] = ln(x)
Here's the point where I get stuck. What I'm pretty sure you can't do is break up the pieces (ie: you can't say ln(x)*ln(4) for ln(x+4) )
Ideas?
Thanks!
~Kim~
PS...in case anyone's wondering, this isn't my homework. I'm out of college & just am doing this to see if I remember - which apparently, I don't!
It's been years since I've done calculus and can't believe I can't remember how to do something like this.
Can anyone help?
I assume the directions would be to solve for "x".
ln(x+4) - ln(x+2) = ln(x)
Using some of the properties, couldn't you rewrite that like this:
ln [ (x+4) / (x+2) ] = ln(x)
Here's the point where I get stuck. What I'm pretty sure you can't do is break up the pieces (ie: you can't say ln(x)*ln(4) for ln(x+4) )
Ideas?
Thanks!
~Kim~
PS...in case anyone's wondering, this isn't my homework. I'm out of college & just am doing this to see if I remember - which apparently, I don't!
#3
eridia78, I'm in Hollywood (FL) too.
Ok - anyway....using that, I have this:
(x+4)/(x+2) = x
Multiplying both sides by (x+2), I have this now:
(x+4) = (x)*(x+2)
x + 4 = x^2 + 2x
0 = x^2 + 1x - 4
Can't be factored, so use the quad. equation to solve for x.
Am I on the right track?
~Kim~
Ok - anyway....using that, I have this:
(x+4)/(x+2) = x
Multiplying both sides by (x+2), I have this now:
(x+4) = (x)*(x+2)
x + 4 = x^2 + 2x
0 = x^2 + 1x - 4
Can't be factored, so use the quad. equation to solve for x.
Am I on the right track?
~Kim~
#4
Originally posted by JerseyGirl
Can't be factored, so use the quad. equation to solve for x.
Can't be factored, so use the quad. equation to solve for x.
Yes, you're on the right track.
By the way, you'll get two solutions to the quadratic equation, only one of which is valid in the original equation. Any idea why?
Trending Topics
#8
But it belongs to the algebraic classification, not Calculus. I suppose that when you take single-variable Calculus, they'll make you review logs and natural logs. So that's where the confusion takes place.
#9
Hey everyone!
Thanks for the assistance! It's been years since I did this stuff. I have some random girl from FAU who IMs me every now & then w/ a problem she picked up in class (Calculus I) and I like to see if I remember how to do it.
Magician, I did mean to write "quadratic formula" (not equation) - thanks for bringing that up. Hopefully now I won't forget!
God - I've got to start teaching this stuff so it sticks!
We've got some smart people on here!
~Kim~
Thanks for the assistance! It's been years since I did this stuff. I have some random girl from FAU who IMs me every now & then w/ a problem she picked up in class (Calculus I) and I like to see if I remember how to do it.
Magician, I did mean to write "quadratic formula" (not equation) - thanks for bringing that up. Hopefully now I won't forget!
God - I've got to start teaching this stuff so it sticks!
We've got some smart people on here!
~Kim~