Intakes for s2k
06-16-2003, 02:28 AM
#11
Registered User
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had absolutely no problems with the AEM driving in hard rain and big puddles. My S2000 was stock height though. Your bumper would have to be submerged in water up a few inches from the bottom for hydrolock to occur.
06-16-2003, 02:03 PM
#12
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: 90% civic / 10% s2000
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hey snuffyrsx. i have a PRM intake in cherry condition. used for about a month. $150. let me know.
as far as gains, i think it got a little more responsive. at least it clears the clutter under the hood. b
as far as gains, i think it got a little more responsive. at least it clears the clutter under the hood. b
06-19-2003, 08:18 AM
#14
Registered User
The Mugen CF intake is indeed a piece of art...I think smccurry and kekoa will both agree with me, the only thing not so perfect about it is the idling noise
I have the Mugen vented hood, and the noise is loud....and with the open vents, the intake gets dirty all the time...why didnt Mugen clearcoat it just like the hood? I dont get it
I have the Mugen vented hood, and the noise is loud....and with the open vents, the intake gets dirty all the time...why didnt Mugen clearcoat it just like the hood? I dont get it
06-19-2003, 09:54 AM
#15
Registered User
I ended up getting the Mugen CAI. I sold my Spoon airduct last night as a matter of fact.
I couldn't resist seeing Steves intake. I had to have it. Anyway I will let you know once I get it installed if I notice any gains.
I couldn't resist seeing Steves intake. I had to have it. Anyway I will let you know once I get it installed if I notice any gains.
06-19-2003, 10:36 AM
#18
Registered User
Stu, when i purchased the intake I asked Scott if its clearcoated and he told me Mugen CF intake is not clearcoated
If you compare your intake to the CF hood, you will see a big difference, the CF hood is much shinnier. I discussed this with dan, turbo_pwr and he was curious why Mugen didnt clearcoat the intake as well
it looks shinny when its clean, but its not clearcoated
If you compare your intake to the CF hood, you will see a big difference, the CF hood is much shinnier. I discussed this with dan, turbo_pwr and he was curious why Mugen didnt clearcoat the intake as well
it looks shinny when its clean, but its not clearcoated
06-19-2003, 10:39 AM
#19
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Place to be
Posts: 9,866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Xplosiv
Stu, when i purchased the intake I asked Scott if its clearcoated and he told me Mugen CF intake is not clearcoated
If you compare your intake to the CF hood, you will see a big difference, the CF hood is much shinnier. I discussed this with dan, turbo_pwr and he was curious why Mugen didnt clearcoat the intake as well
it looks shinny when its clean, but its not clearcoated
Stu, when i purchased the intake I asked Scott if its clearcoated and he told me Mugen CF intake is not clearcoated
If you compare your intake to the CF hood, you will see a big difference, the CF hood is much shinnier. I discussed this with dan, turbo_pwr and he was curious why Mugen didnt clearcoat the intake as well
it looks shinny when its clean, but its not clearcoated
gotcha. I've only seen the real mugen cf hood once in person. I'm stuck with the j's style for the time being. 
06-19-2003, 10:41 AM
#20
Registered User
it looks fabulous...and it shines in every angle
btw you should clearcoat ya intake, it will looks so much better...well at least armorall it once a week to make it look bling bling