Hard at Work Mid-A Off-topic Playground.

#8**8$# 65th Official Hard at Work Thread #8**8$#

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-09-2006 | 10:46 AM
  #1821  
PopTarts's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 42,366
Likes: 1
From: Yrmom, MD
Default

Originally Posted by blue03s2k,May 9 2006, 11:55 AM
NEWS FLASH...
<<< ONLY CHILD... i think i would know from my OWN personal experience.....
i don't need to take a child development class to learn how i turned out....... becuase you're the only child doesn't mean you're deprived of a better chance at early development of some social mechanisms.........

keep in mind.. your FIRST CHILD will be an ONLY CHILD till you wifey ends up poping out another one...... so your first child will have a similar development as a baby/young child as someone that is an ONLY CHILD for their whole life.......


your reasoning to have more then one kid is quite flawed....
News flash - I didn't say *all* only children turn out poorly or anything stupid like that... nor did I say that *all* only children are inferior. Nor did I say they are always deprived. You know I have all the respect in the world for you, Mark.

I said that I'd rather have more than one because from what I've observed and learned, that folks with siblings are exposed to social stimuli that otherwise don't exist.
Old 05-09-2006 | 10:47 AM
  #1822  
PopTarts's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 42,366
Likes: 1
From: Yrmom, MD
Default

It's sort of like saying "I'd rather bring in a lefty to face a lefty batter." Obviously at any point a lefty pitcher can give up a monster home run to any lefty. But I'd rather have my lefty face him than my righty, all things being equal.

Haha... If I reacted the same way as you guys, my response could be all like
"So you all are saying Skip is dead wrong, and that he's a terrible decision maker for having more than one kid???? That's a poor/flawed line of thinking."
Old 05-09-2006 | 10:49 AM
  #1823  
PopTarts's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 42,366
Likes: 1
From: Yrmom, MD
Default

Originally Posted by GOGOGO,May 9 2006, 12:04 PM
Kinda like knowing that you are mentaly ill, if you are, and don't need no stinking doctor to confirm it?

Last famous words of dead people "I know what I am doing"...
Old 05-09-2006 | 11:01 AM
  #1824  
Zeemz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,017
Likes: 0
From: Alexandria, Va
Default

SHUT UP JOHN!!!!!
Old 05-09-2006 | 11:01 AM
  #1825  
Zeemz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,017
Likes: 0
From: Alexandria, Va
Default

Someone had to say it













Old 05-09-2006 | 11:01 AM
  #1826  
cap1's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 167,324
Likes: 0
From: Northern Virginia
Default

Old 05-09-2006 | 11:03 AM
  #1827  
johnny's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 50,370
Likes: 0
From: All over SoCal
Default

hey, does it seem like they made the minimum wait time b/w posts longer?
Old 05-09-2006 | 11:03 AM
  #1828  
papa5murf's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 43,083
Likes: 0
From: London, England
Default

Originally Posted by PopTarts,May 9 2006, 01:46 PM
News flash - I didn't say *all* only children turn out poorly or anything stupid like that... nor did I say that *all* only children are inferior. Nor did I say they are always deprived. You know I have all the respect in the world for you, Mark.

I said that I'd rather have more than one because from what I've observed and learned, that folks with siblings are exposed to social stimuli that otherwise don't exist.
well come up with a better reason to have more then one kid then to develop thier social abilities....

like.... i dunno.... "i want 5 boys, so i can have a korean basketball team".... or "i want 11 kids, so i can have a football team".... or better yet... "i want a son and a daughter"...

but to base it on some study thats mostly based on opinions that could be correct in some instances and wrong in others is quite lame...
Old 05-09-2006 | 11:05 AM
  #1829  
papa5murf's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 43,083
Likes: 0
From: London, England
Default

Originally Posted by johnny,May 9 2006, 02:03 PM
hey, does it seem like they made the minimum wait time b/w posts longer?
i think it's because the site is all screwie.... sometimes it's 15 seconds.. sometimes it's dumb and doesn't know when it's been 15 seconds...
Old 05-09-2006 | 11:06 AM
  #1830  
papa5murf's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 43,083
Likes: 0
From: London, England
Default

Originally Posted by Zeemz,May 9 2006, 02:01 PM
Someone had to say it
















All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:50 AM.