Engine Swaps Discussion of alternate engine swaps into the S2000 other than F20/22. K24, 2JZ, V6, V8 etc...

S2000 K20A2 Swap

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-06-2020, 04:41 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
veiri86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Thanks a lot

Many Thanks that was extremely helpfu. Am about to start the same process. But I have K24. So my question is will the "Intake Manifold Adapter – JSP" which says for K20 fit my K24?


Thanks


Old 12-28-2020, 07:48 AM
  #22  
Jub

 
Jub's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 1,538
Received 416 Likes on 326 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by beefystud
x2 , total waste of time and money just to lose 30 hp , should have fully built 2.6 brian crower stroker , but judging from his front bumper looks like hes a broke ass
K24 blocks are taller. I'm not familiar with the nuances of S2000 swaps but in civics a k24 meant a compromise in either hood raising or a low oil pan. It also does not rev as high reliably which is one of the desired characteristics of a s2000. I believe the k20 is also more ideal in terms of certain architectural considerations (rod/stroke ratio for one) which indicate that it is theoretically more stout. There is still no replacement for displacement in terms of pure numbers but that doesn't negate that a k20 may be preferred in some instances.

Using the look of someone's front bumper of a second+ car as a proxy to their bank account/net worth is pretty stupid. It's really bad logic and pretty insulting. Lots of times, the ones with the fanciest front bumpers are the most broke. The ones with the beat up bumpers laugh at the ones with the fancy bumpers for thinking they fancy.
The following 3 users liked this post by Jub:
Overfreeze (12-31-2020), shrykhar (12-28-2020), Walter Smith (12-04-2023)
Old 12-28-2020, 09:13 AM
  #23  
Registered User

 
randomwalk101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Houston
Posts: 574
Received 83 Likes on 75 Posts
Default

So You Want To K-Swap Your S2000? Part 1 | Speed Academy

Updated Must Haves for K Swapping A Honda S2000 | Speed Academy

Last edited by randomwalk101; 12-28-2020 at 09:37 AM.
Old 12-31-2020, 02:11 PM
  #24  

 
Bullwings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,633
Received 612 Likes on 427 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jub
K24 blocks are taller. I'm not familiar with the nuances of S2000 swaps but in civics a k24 meant a compromise in either hood raising or a low oil pan. It also does not rev as high reliably which is one of the desired characteristics of a s2000. I believe the k20 is also more ideal in terms of certain architectural considerations (rod/stroke ratio for one) which indicate that it is theoretically more stout. There is still no replacement for displacement in terms of pure numbers but that doesn't negate that a k20 may be preferred in some instances.

Using the look of someone's front bumper of a second+ car as a proxy to their bank account/net worth is pretty stupid. It's really bad logic and pretty insulting. Lots of times, the ones with the fanciest front bumpers are the most broke. The ones with the beat up bumpers laugh at the ones with the fancy bumpers for thinking they fancy.
To add to this, also depends on the application and how it's used. Its not always about peak numbers. I too would pick a K20 over a K24 and rev it to the moon...

skip to 6:05 for why he went K20 over K24. Pretty sure it's not because he's a broke ass....
Old 12-31-2020, 04:48 PM
  #25  
Registered User

 
JonC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by beefystud
x2 , total waste of time and money just to lose 30 hp , should have fully built 2.6 brian crower stroker , but judging from his front bumper looks like hes a broke ass
I enjoy skimming through the forums to read build threads like this. If we didnt have talented people doing interesting projects, we'd just be left with a forum full of negative twats like you insulting people because you have nothing else better to do during your day.
Old 05-05-2021, 06:15 PM
  #26  

 
zze86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 845
Received 140 Likes on 114 Posts
Default

Any updates to this? Would love to hear how this turns out.
Old 06-05-2021, 11:43 AM
  #27  

 
beefystud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 429
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jub
K24 blocks are taller. I'm not familiar with the nuances of S2000 swaps but in civics a k24 meant a compromise in either hood raising or a low oil pan. It also does not rev as high reliably which is one of the desired characteristics of a s2000. I believe the k20 is also more ideal in terms of certain architectural considerations (rod/stroke ratio for one) which indicate that it is theoretically more stout. There is still no replacement for displacement in terms of pure numbers but that doesn't negate that a k20 may be preferred in some instances.

Using the look of someone's front bumper of a second+ car as a proxy to their bank account/net worth is pretty stupid. It's really bad logic and pretty insulting. Lots of times, the ones with the fanciest front bumpers are the most broke. The ones with the beat up bumpers laugh at the ones with the fancy bumpers for thinking they fancy.
s2000 oil pump will letvyou rev ad high as you want
Old 07-06-2021, 10:40 AM
  #28  
Jub

 
Jub's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 1,538
Received 416 Likes on 326 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by beefystud
s2000 oil pump will letvyou rev ad high as you want
There are a lot more to engine mechanics than oil pressure/cavitation. We're on a s2000 forum... Why do you think a F20C has fuel cutoff at 9,150 RPM and a F22C at 8,350? Hint, it's not the oil pump.

The physics of the moving pieces and the metallurgy of those pieces are very important things to consider. The rotating assembly of a 2.4L engine is going to be heavier than that of a 2.0L engine, all other things equal. The pistons and rods will be heavier and need to travel more distance to meet the same RPM. For a piston to travel more distance in the same period of time, piston speed and acceleration is going to be higher. That is going to generate significantly more force than the smaller engine. There are also other geometric considerations that are different between the two such as Rod/Stroke ratio. The design/geometry will determine where/how those forces are applied. If you're actually interested, read up more on engine theory/design. I know next to nothing but I do find it interesting. A very rudimentary understanding of it will help you see why K20 vs. K24 is more of a question than just the oil pump.
Old 11-10-2021, 12:14 PM
  #29  
Community Organizer

 
Ricky_Flowers_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 5,507
Received 226 Likes on 143 Posts
Default

Holy shit this is a great thread. Getting ready to do a similar swap in my car. Will be saving this one.
The following 2 users liked this post by Ricky_Flowers_:
Bullwings (11-16-2021), pastoli (11-21-2021)
Old 11-10-2021, 01:01 PM
  #30  
Moderator

 
engifineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 6,043
Received 1,441 Likes on 1,081 Posts
Default

I dunno, talking about the power "coming in more linearly". I mean NA, we are talking about engines that you have to really push to make them break the wheels loose. These are not 600 hp powerplants lol. I really feel he just liked the higher revs. IF that floats your boat, then go for it. No way would I choose it over a K24 in my S2k. K24 just makes more sense in my opinion even if I am giving up a little rpm.


Quick Reply: S2000 K20A2 Swap



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:48 PM.