The Corner House of Whores and Monkeys. Enter for Fun & Shenanigans! We're weird here. In the most awesome way possible.

Unofficial Stupidly Long Usless Word Thread

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-19-2005 | 10:15 AM
  #11  
CaptainMike's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,526
Likes: 5
From: Hurricane City, FL
Default

A reasonable comprimise solution would probably be to hold the MTBE maunfacturers laible for sites contaminated after a certian date. i.e. a date when the evidence of the harmful nature of this product had become overwhelming.
Old 07-19-2005 | 10:49 AM
  #12  
The Raptor's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 58,715
Likes: 1,299
From: La Crescenta, CA
Default

I agree. However, our legislators seem to abhor reasonable compromises.
Old 07-19-2005 | 10:51 AM
  #13  
The Raptor's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 58,715
Likes: 1,299
From: La Crescenta, CA
Default

Also, MTBE is a proprietary ARCO technology and a lot of people think ARCO WITHHELD scientific withheld of MTBE health hazards from the public domain for a long time.
Old 07-19-2005 | 10:57 AM
  #14  
PeaceLove&S2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 19,255
Likes: 18
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Originally Posted by The Raptor,Jul 19 2005, 12:05 PM
MTBE is banned in California and some other states. It seems to be at the heart of the new energy bill. The House version (and the Bush Administration) holds MTBE manufacturers exempt from liability for site remediation, the Senate version does not. Neither side wants to compromise. I side with the Senate. I've remediated sites with MTBE contamination.
A reasonable comprimise solution would probably be to hold the MTBE maunfacturers exempt from liability for site remediation at the White House and liable everywhere else.

Old 07-19-2005 | 11:02 AM
  #15  
CaptainMike's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,526
Likes: 5
From: Hurricane City, FL
Default

I was just going to say.... doesn't the Bush family have close ties with ARCO?
Nah, couldn't be, that might be some sort of conflict of interest or something.
Old 07-19-2005 | 11:06 AM
  #16  
CaptainMike's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,526
Likes: 5
From: Hurricane City, FL
Default

I was President once...


Of 'The Esoteric League of Insousciant Students in Favor of Legislative Opposition to Antidisestablishmentarianism'

I was somehow able to avoid all these sticky ethical conflict of interest type problems that Pres. Bush keeps running into.
Old 07-19-2005 | 11:13 AM
  #17  
mikes2k's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 88,421
Likes: 15
From: Pt. A to Pt. B via VTEC!!
Default

Originally Posted by CaptainMike,Jul 19 2005, 02:02 PM
I was just going to say.... doesn't the Bush family have close ties with ARCO?
Nah, couldn't be, that might be some sort of conflict of interest or something.
Now that would be a shocker! NMLB
Old 07-19-2005 | 01:37 PM
  #18  
The Raptor's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 58,715
Likes: 1,299
From: La Crescenta, CA
Default

Yeah, sort of like "I will fire any member of the White House staff who leaks confidential information..........uh, except Karl Rove."
Old 07-22-2005 | 03:15 PM
  #19  
luvs2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Wyndmoor
Default

Originally Posted by CaptainMike,Jul 18 2005, 09:24 PM
Here's one for you:
Pneumonultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis
I believe that it the absolute longest word...so says the internet.

Here is my favorite all time long word:

Supraclavicularlymphadenopathy

I type that word on and off again. Drug names are also up there in some of the longest words.
Old 07-22-2005 | 03:50 PM
  #20  
luvs2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Wyndmoor
Default

here is the longest chemical word1,185)

ACETYLSERYLTYROSYLSERYLISOLEUCYLTHREONYLSERYLPROLY L



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:57 PM.