The Corner House of Whores and Monkeys. Enter for Fun & Shenanigans! We're weird here. In the most awesome way possible.

PIX!

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-11-2005 | 09:49 AM
  #1  
SR71BB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,760
Likes: 0
From: ghettoville, abq, nm
Default PIX!

Or, more accurately, what to use?

I'm looking for an inexpensive digital camera <$200, with decent optical zoom, good resolution, and manual focus. Anyone have good/bad experiences? Right now the Canon A75 is the leading candidate - it's only downfall is non-rechargeable power supply

Old 01-11-2005 | 09:50 AM
  #2  
TepEvan's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 53,292
Likes: 789
From: Owings Mills, MD
Default

I have the Canon A70 (which is the older version of the A75). I bought the energizer rechargable batteries and charger which last a long time, plus a spare set of batteries. Great camera!!
Old 01-11-2005 | 10:06 AM
  #3  
WestSideBilly's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 93,291
Likes: 806
From: Nowhere
Default

I don't think you'll find a true manual focus on any camera under $200.


We've got an A75 in our department and it's done a very good job. Battery life was a non-issue though, since we rarely take more than 4 or 5 pictures at a time. We have two sets of rechargable AAs and they get the job done for that.
Old 01-11-2005 | 10:23 AM
  #4  
PeaceLove&S2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 19,255
Likes: 18
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Originally Posted by WestSideBilly,Jan 11 2005, 01:06 PM
I don't think you'll find a true manual focus on any camera under $200.


My Canon G3 (about $500) supposedly has manual focus, but it's not very good (it's hard to see if something is *really* in focus on the LCD display).

If you really want manual focus, I'd think that SLRs are your only choice (~$1000 for a low end camera).
Old 01-11-2005 | 10:26 AM
  #5  
SR71BB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,760
Likes: 0
From: ghettoville, abq, nm
Default

Thanks for the quick replies. The manual focus feature comes in handy at Daytona - you can set the focus on a specific part of the corner, then catch the cars as they hit that spot. Auto-focus takes too damn long.
Old 01-11-2005 | 10:30 AM
  #6  
WestSideBilly's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 93,291
Likes: 806
From: Nowhere
Default

That's definitely a feature you won't get below the $700-800 price point.

You can try Canon's "speed" mode and run 1600 simulated ISO and you *should* get ok results for the cars in the corner. I've used it at S2000 meets and about 1/2 the pictures turn out well - and the ones that do are very cool. Though if you're trying to shoot a high speed corner (> 100 MPH) with the zoom extended, it won't happen.
Old 01-11-2005 | 10:35 AM
  #7  
PeaceLove&S2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 19,255
Likes: 18
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Originally Posted by SR71BB,Jan 11 2005, 01:26 PM
Thanks for the quick replies. The manual focus feature comes in handy at Daytona - you can set the focus on a specific part of the corner, then catch the cars as they hit that spot. Auto-focus takes too damn long.
I guess here's something you could do:
Aim your camera at an object at the corner (well before the car gets there). Press the shutter button half way down, so that the camera focuses on the object, but doesn't take a picture. Wait for car to arrive at the spot, and press the button all the way down.
Old 01-11-2005 | 10:37 AM
  #8  
SR71BB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,760
Likes: 0
From: ghettoville, abq, nm
Default

yep, I've resorted to that technique before.
Old 01-11-2005 | 10:59 AM
  #9  
mikes2k's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 88,421
Likes: 15
From: Pt. A to Pt. B via VTEC!!
Default

Cheapskate! Spend some money!! At the very least you need ISO adjustments and shutter speed. I My Canon S400
Old 01-11-2005 | 11:07 AM
  #10  
SR71BB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,760
Likes: 0
From: ghettoville, abq, nm
Default

Cheap indeed! If I'm going to spend $$ on camera equipment, it would be for more lenses for my 35mm SLR! I want something that, if dropped in the infield, or in a bar, won't make me
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
iNetForce
Off-topic Talk
11
03-12-2006 02:08 PM
RotoRooter
Off-topic Talk
2
08-02-2004 05:15 AM
Jibb47
Off-topic Talk
16
12-29-2003 12:17 PM
djohnston
Off-topic Talk
10
06-17-2003 07:55 AM
lostsol
Off-topic Talk
19
03-02-2003 05:22 PM



Quick Reply: PIX!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:28 AM.