Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

Ride height on a fwd

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-28-2012 | 02:24 PM
  #1  
s2konroids's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 20,788
Likes: 8
From: location, location
Default Ride height on a fwd

I appreciate this is not the best place to ask.

On my mk1 diesel Fabia vrs I have fitted coilovers, they are only height adjustable not damper rate adjustable. The rear arches are taller than the front, but being most likely front heavy what ride heights should I go for, for the best overall handling?

Level or slightly nose down?

Cheers
Old 12-28-2012 | 02:25 PM
  #2  
BuggyofMildDiscomfort's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 117
Default

Slightly nose down is the usual choice for aero stability as much as anything.
Old 12-28-2012 | 02:30 PM
  #3  
s2konroids's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 20,788
Likes: 8
From: location, location
Default

Yeah i suspected as much thanks.
Old 12-29-2012 | 10:09 AM
  #4  
WinFreak's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,859
Likes: 4
From: London/Surrey - UK
Default

I'd say try it, bet you won't even feel the difference on a car like that. Might as well set it up so it looks good
Old 12-29-2012 | 10:13 AM
  #5  
Dembo's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,112
Likes: 1
From: Banbury, Oxfordshire
Default

When I had an FTO, all the lowering springs you could get would lower the front more. But just for looks. Assuming you get the geo sorted afterwards, you're not going to notice a difference.

Best for handling may well be leaving it alone.
Old 12-29-2012 | 10:54 AM
  #6  
PhilipGB's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by s2konroids
I appreciate this is not the best place to ask.

On my mk1 diesel Fabia vrs I have fitted coilovers, they are only height adjustable not damper rate adjustable. The rear arches are taller than the front, but being most likely front heavy what ride heights should I go for, for the best overall handling?

Level or slightly nose down?

Cheers
Rear ride height on an FWD is typically to do with luggage capacity. Remember these are still meant to be practical cars. A friend of mine had a lowered Bora and pretty much made it useless for rear passengers and luggage.
Old 12-29-2012 | 12:41 PM
  #7  
Dembo's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,112
Likes: 1
From: Banbury, Oxfordshire
Default

Originally Posted by PhilipGB
A friend of mine had a lowered Bora and pretty much made it useless for rear passengers and luggage.
Why would anybody lower a Bora? It's not going to improve the looks, and the handling is a lost cause anyway.
Old 12-30-2012 | 10:35 AM
  #8  
Ultra_Nexus's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 12,330
Likes: 0
From: Frustration
Default

Difficult question. Lowering the front more will further distribute weight to an already overloaded axle.
Old 12-30-2012 | 03:27 PM
  #9  
AlexGJ248's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,407
Likes: 1
From: Cheshire
Default

Giving it positive rake, (nose down) technically gives better downforce. However, I doubt you would be able to notice any dfference aero wise.
Old 01-02-2013 | 11:17 PM
  #10  
TangoVTEC's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 34
Default

You may find that it has an effect on steering feel and behaviour too.

Tyre wear as well, obviously.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:22 AM.