Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

The potential supercharged F20C recipient

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-30-2012, 02:31 PM
  #81  

Thread Starter
 
BuggyofMildDiscomfort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,512
Received 117 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Yep, still working on the manifold....


Old 12-30-2012, 02:34 PM
  #82  

 
E4RTH WORM JIM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: East Yorkshire
Posts: 5,927
Received 29 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Why so many bends?

Isn't that now pointing towards the front on the buggy?
Old 12-30-2012, 02:43 PM
  #83  

Thread Starter
 
BuggyofMildDiscomfort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,512
Received 117 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

It is indeed, the secondaries will go over the transaxle and around to a silencer on the other side of the engine down by the floorpan.
So many bends were needed to get the ideal length, which is more important than keeping the manifold straight, ideally of course, you'd have both, but there's not a lot of room there once there's a 33" tall wheel and tyre swinging up and down....
Old 12-31-2012, 07:07 AM
  #84  

 
E4RTH WORM JIM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: East Yorkshire
Posts: 5,927
Received 29 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Ah right. So what's the ideal exhaust length?
Old 12-31-2012, 07:41 AM
  #85  

Thread Starter
 
BuggyofMildDiscomfort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,512
Received 117 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Depends on where you want the torque, and how long a manifold you can fit in the engine bay. (there are a few different lengths you can choose to take advantage of different resonance peaks depending on how long you can fit in the car, the ones from a longer manifold are more powerful than those from a shorter).

Anyway the gears are fairly wide on the buggy, so I wanted to concentrate on bolstering the area from 4krpm to 7krpm (I don't think top end power is going to be much of an issue), there are different lengths for different resonant frequencies but that should put a good boost to the torque curve from approx 5.5krpm to 6.3krpms, and another around the 4k to 4.6krpm area, and one around 2.5krpm to 3krpm, which'll just help if the car finds some grip or sinks and bogs down somewhere - provided the math and a few assumptions are close anyhow!
Theoretically it may cost a few HP up top but the dyno will tell the story at the end!

Basically there should be a fair chunk more midrange than a stock car.
Old 12-31-2012, 07:52 AM
  #86  

 
razzele's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Turbotoon
Posts: 5,709
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default



I wish i could weld stuff like that !

Interesting read, thanks for posting.
Old 12-31-2012, 08:01 AM
  #87  

Thread Starter
 
BuggyofMildDiscomfort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,512
Received 117 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Haha, that welding ain't that great to look at tbh, we can do better

In my defence, the tubing is second hand and there's some shit in the inside (dairy tube from a place up the road who were replacing it) so I couldn't see the point in purging it, but then this ain't a show car, so fancy welds weren't a priority. I'll take £40 for all the materials for the exhaust - including the parts to make the silencer - over buying £400 of shiny new pipe to get fancy looking welding any day of the week !
Old 12-31-2012, 09:45 AM
  #88  

Thread Starter
 
BuggyofMildDiscomfort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,512
Received 117 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Old 12-31-2012, 12:53 PM
  #89  
Registered User

 
Ultra_Nexus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Frustration
Posts: 12,330
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BuggyofMildDiscomfort
but then this ain't a show car, so fancy welds weren't a priority. I'll take £40 for all the materials for the exhaust - including the parts to make the silencer - over buying £400 of shiny new pipe to get fancy looking welding any day of the week !


Function over form.

Incidentally, is there a reason these are rear engined and not mid engined or is it just easier to package?
Old 12-31-2012, 01:39 PM
  #90  

Thread Starter
 
BuggyofMildDiscomfort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,512
Received 117 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Very heavy rear bias on the weight distribution solely for traction, with it being RWD.
It was originally based around a beetle derived buggy with the engine hung out of the back, if it was a scratch build with this in aim to start with, things would have been a bit different - still be heavy on the rear but I would have done it by making the front lighter and sticking the engine over the back axle in a scratch build, instead of behind it!


Quick Reply: The potential supercharged F20C recipient



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:17 PM.