Notice of intended prosecution
#101
#102
Originally Posted by m1bjr' timestamp='1311801485' post='20821896
[quote name='unclefester' timestamp='1311770521' post='20819871']
If i was on my way to a seriously ill family member, i'd drive like hell and if i lost my license in the process i'd not blink twice about it.
However if i killed someone on the way due to excessive speed, would that justify my actions - no.
If i was on my way to a seriously ill family member, i'd drive like hell and if i lost my license in the process i'd not blink twice about it.
However if i killed someone on the way due to excessive speed, would that justify my actions - no.
Honestly, talk about contradictions.
If a family member was on their death bed, are you telling me you'd not try and make the world spin in the other direction to get there?
[/quote]
Not so Black and White now.
Is it.
#103
Originally Posted by unclefester' timestamp='1311804980' post='20822102
[quote name='m1bjr' timestamp='1311801485' post='20821896']
[quote name='unclefester' timestamp='1311770521' post='20819871']
If i was on my way to a seriously ill family member, i'd drive like hell and if i lost my license in the process i'd not blink twice about it.
However if i killed someone on the way due to excessive speed, would that justify my actions - no.
[quote name='unclefester' timestamp='1311770521' post='20819871']
If i was on my way to a seriously ill family member, i'd drive like hell and if i lost my license in the process i'd not blink twice about it.
However if i killed someone on the way due to excessive speed, would that justify my actions - no.
Honestly, talk about contradictions.
If a family member was on their death bed, are you telling me you'd not try and make the world spin in the other direction to get there?
[/quote]
Not so Black and White now.
Is it.
[/quote]
Yes it is.
If you get nicked on the way there doing whatever speed over the legal limit you have no more excuse in the eyes of the law than anyone else, if it's a camera ..even less so. Either way you 'man up' and take it on the chin.
The responsibility for your chosen actions is yours and yours alone - that's it ... black and white, no shades of grey.
#104
Banned
so, undertaking in the US (and maybe more places) - works fine there but wouldn't work here
reducing road markings - works fine in Holland but wouldn't work here
no speed limit - works fine on the Autobahn but wouldn't work here
what would work here?
speed cameras
right
reducing road markings - works fine in Holland but wouldn't work here
no speed limit - works fine on the Autobahn but wouldn't work here
what would work here?
speed cameras
right
#105
Bless you
It must be difficult though, as the eyes age and the responses slow down ... spotting speed limit signs and those nasty bright yellow boxes they insist on hiding.
Perhaps it's time to get a chauffer .......
It must be difficult though, as the eyes age and the responses slow down ... spotting speed limit signs and those nasty bright yellow boxes they insist on hiding.
Perhaps it's time to get a chauffer .......
#106
Originally Posted by arsie' timestamp='1311780005' post='20820416
I would also include under 'not a good idea' speeding on the way to a sick or very ill relative, or your wife in labour - what if this caused an accident?
If it didn't, what exactly is the problem?
Again, as I said in my case, had I been driving at 90mph in busy traffic in a residential area (how would be a separate issue) then I can see the sense in a slap/points/fine
But 60 in a 50 in a non-res area on a dc with NO other traffic on the road......
The facts are that the initial offence was caught by camera but none of the many humans involved in the process subsequently were willing to show any of this much vaunted discretion
That's the norm with camera related offences and it just seems daft to me
This human element (and no, magistrates are not really human ) is sadly lacking these days and I presume it will only get worse as automation takes more control, and less police due to spending cuts.
T2 anyone? Skynet is where we are heading with this one lol won't be long before we all have GPS trackers that ticket/debit us £x for every 1 mph over the limit. (or driving in an environmentally unsound manner)
#107
Registered User
So it seems as if you're saying that old people should be banned/restricted as they are a bit of a menace on the roads.
Great idea, I agree wholeheartedly and whilst we're at it why not ban sports cars ? They are the ones that go fast aren't they ?
#108
Nope not personalising it - possibly a hint of tongue in cheek but that's fine here.
It doesn't seem that at all because that's not what I said. I suggested that if someone has had enough of negotiating speed cameras and the like then there are other options open to them.
That said, if you can't be bothered to check the camera databases, if you struggle to see speed limit signs, can't see the cameras or just cannot be bothered to stick to the speed limits then you really have no excuse if you get caught.
if you drive for a living and don't have a camera detector fitted - get one.
if you want to enjoy driving on roads that don't have cameras, do a recce run first to check out your intended route.
If you get nabbed doing 7mph over the posted limit because, in your own words, your speed wandered because you were concentrating on something else then you still have only yourself to blame.
Otherwise it's just carping about something which you DO have 100% control over
Some late statistics for you those of you who like that kind of thing ..... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...ted_death_rate
We are lower than Germany and far lower than Holland, the only lower one of relevance is Sweden and they are far far FAR stricter with both road laws and vehicle regulations,.
It doesn't seem that at all because that's not what I said. I suggested that if someone has had enough of negotiating speed cameras and the like then there are other options open to them.
That said, if you can't be bothered to check the camera databases, if you struggle to see speed limit signs, can't see the cameras or just cannot be bothered to stick to the speed limits then you really have no excuse if you get caught.
if you drive for a living and don't have a camera detector fitted - get one.
if you want to enjoy driving on roads that don't have cameras, do a recce run first to check out your intended route.
If you get nabbed doing 7mph over the posted limit because, in your own words, your speed wandered because you were concentrating on something else then you still have only yourself to blame.
Otherwise it's just carping about something which you DO have 100% control over
Some late statistics for you those of you who like that kind of thing ..... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...ted_death_rate
We are lower than Germany and far lower than Holland, the only lower one of relevance is Sweden and they are far far FAR stricter with both road laws and vehicle regulations,.
#109
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: On another planet
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The US also allow turning left against a red signal but we have a fundamentally different roads system here. And don't forget the speed limit in the US is 55 MPH.
Reducing road markings would cause more "accidents" here. It may be more suitable to compare India with its general lack of road markings, congestion and road fatality rate.
There is a good argument for raising the motorway speed limit though IMO, if only to apply at "quiet" times
I do not think this would help to REDUCE casualty figures BTW, it just appears to be an out-dated limit and how many people actually stick to 70 on the motorway anyway ?
Marksmen picking off speeders would probably solve the speeding issue. Wouldn't do much for the casualty stats though.
#110
^^^ What a ridiculous suggestion
More collisions occur at junctions than (working) traffic lights
People have difficulty staying within the markings at the best of times, it would resemble something from the "Wacky Races", you can be Dick Dastardly
Confusion reigns when road makings are removed, it may make people slower but not necessarily safer
It would just add to the number of low speed "accidents"
More collisions occur at junctions than (working) traffic lights
People have difficulty staying within the markings at the best of times, it would resemble something from the "Wacky Races", you can be Dick Dastardly
Confusion reigns when road makings are removed, it may make people slower but not necessarily safer
It would just add to the number of low speed "accidents"
It is a measured fact that congestion reduces in areas where the traffic lights have failed.