Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

Nearly Cars

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-16-2007, 03:03 PM
  #71  
Banned
 
gaddafi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Survivalist enclave
Posts: 31,755
Received 69 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=moff,Feb 16 2007, 11:23 PM]
There are lots of people out there who don't give a monkey about performance, but, for
Old 02-16-2007, 03:09 PM
  #72  
Registered User
 
moff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 7,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gaddafi,Feb 17 2007, 12:03 AM
This thread is not about those people

A lot of women and retired people fit the profile you describe, and good luck to them

This thread wasn't about any one particular demographic of person.

The thread was about the types of cars, and the justification for liking / buying them or not.


What is the f**king point of them. Cars that have the same body as the top of the range model, but have 1/10th of the performance. Why would you do that. As I just posted on the pistonheads news section, why can't we just have slow cars that look slow and fast looking ones that go fast. It keeps everyone honest. It puts an incentive on to people to get better jobs and work harder at school to get a better looking car.

I've never understood cars like the 306 Xsi, Golf Driver, Saxo West Coast, 120bhp A4 S-lines with the S4 bodykit, and now the Ford Focus that looks like an St but has 150bhp or something stupid.
Old 02-16-2007, 03:36 PM
  #73  

 
ade73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hell on toast
Posts: 5,109
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bada Bing!,Feb 15 2007, 07:34 PM
I've never understood cars like the 306 Xsi, Golf Driver, Saxo West Coast, 120bhp A4 S-lines with the S4 bodykit, and now the Ford Focus that looks like an St but has 150bhp or something stupid.
Because people want the looks and toys of the bigger version without the extra cost of insurance, petrol, servicing. Not everybody is bothered about power figures and speed. (you should know that having less than 200BHP )


But the same could be said of why is there a top of the range version of 'normal' cars. Such as the Saxo VTS, its a top of the range piece of french shite designed for women and old farts with no interest in cars.
Old 02-17-2007, 12:04 AM
  #74  
Banned
 
gaddafi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Survivalist enclave
Posts: 31,755
Received 69 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by moff,Feb 17 2007, 12:09 AM
This thread wasn't about any one particular demographic of person.

The thread was about the types of cars, and the justification for liking / buying them or not.

Indeed it was, as you quoted

And the types of cars mentioned are rather different from 'standard' Z4s, SL350s and the like

I think most people see 'the point' of those - and I think my demographic pretty much covers it

However, those cars do not share/ape the bodykits of their top of the food chain siblings

It is quite clear to me that people that choose 'M-sport' 2.0 BMWs (for example) DO have an interest in performance and/or image

And I agree with the central premise they are a bit sad



Old 02-17-2007, 12:16 AM
  #75  
Registered User

 
RUSS H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Peshawar
Posts: 4,305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

High Ho Silver.........

Russ
Old 02-17-2007, 12:33 AM
  #76  
Banned
 
gaddafi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Survivalist enclave
Posts: 31,755
Received 69 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by R39H,Feb 17 2007, 09:16 AM
High Ho Silver.........

Russ
Exactly

Would the Lone Ranger ride a fecking Shetland Pony?


Old 02-17-2007, 01:17 AM
  #77  
UK Moderator

 
lovegroova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Herts
Posts: 24,762
Received 307 Likes on 262 Posts
Default

Here's the thing. Compare a 318i SE against a 318i M-Sport, and the differences are as follows:

SE has a leather steering wheel
M-Sport has 'sports seats' - whatever that means, probably more uncomfortable
M-Sport has anthracite headlining - whatever that is
M-Sport has sports suspension i.e. a crap ride
M-Sport has 17" alloys (SE has 16") i.e. an even crappier ride
M-Sport has low profile tyres (225/45 & 255/40 vs 205/55 & 205/55) yet more crappiness adeded to the ride
M-Sport has some alcantara in the upholstery - oooh
M-Sport has Door sills with M Badge - oooh
M-Sport has High-gloss Shadowline exterior trim - oooh
M-Sport has M Aerodynamic bodystyling - doesn't make it go any faster

M-Sport costs an extra
Old 02-17-2007, 01:25 AM
  #78  
Registered User

 
Welshman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: La Massana, Principat D'Andorra
Posts: 3,796
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Why anyone should do so is a sound question but clearly BMW's marketing department have identified that there is a segment of the market who are prepared to do so.
Old 02-17-2007, 01:29 AM
  #79  
UK Moderator

 
lovegroova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Herts
Posts: 24,762
Received 307 Likes on 262 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Welshman,Feb 17 2007, 10:25 AM
Why anyone should do so is a sound question but clearly BMW's marketing department have identified that there is a segment of the market who are prepared to do so.
Indeed
Old 02-17-2007, 01:30 AM
  #80  
Registered User

 
RUSS H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Peshawar
Posts: 4,305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A lot of women I know drive sporting versions of plain cars.
None of them drive fast though.
I had past and present girlfriends drive the Elise and the Honda,
they all were scared to give it some welly.

Some cars could be stepping stones for them, finances etc

Russ.


Quick Reply: Nearly Cars



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:25 PM.