Mazda MX5
#11
I had a 1.8 Mk2.5 with over 300bhp - now that was a fun car and much much quicker than a S2k and probably quicker than my supercharged S2k. I would miss the electric roof though
#12
Registered User
Thread Starter
#14
Sort of depends.
I'd suggest a snail would be better on an S2K; you forget how wobbly the MX-5 body/chassis actually was!
Then again, if you want a tamer car for softer back-lane cruising that can also be driven on its limits all of the time, a step backwards isn't a bad thing.
I'd suggest a snail would be better on an S2K; you forget how wobbly the MX-5 body/chassis actually was!
Then again, if you want a tamer car for softer back-lane cruising that can also be driven on its limits all of the time, a step backwards isn't a bad thing.
#15
Registered User
Thread Starter
To be fair the roads are so ******* awful here that you can't push on for fear of hitting a pothole or loose tarmac from deteriorating road surface.
Can't remember the last time I Vtec'd yo...
Can't remember the last time I Vtec'd yo...
#16
I think you'd be going backwards for sure Carl, less power, less desirable, dare i say worse looking.
Its not a bad car and it does what i does well...being a reasonably priced, reliable and fun sport'ish car but overall it isn't in the same league as an S2000.
I think are good cars i really do but they are a hell of lot less macho IYKWI
Its not a bad car and it does what i does well...being a reasonably priced, reliable and fun sport'ish car but overall it isn't in the same league as an S2000.
I think are good cars i really do but they are a hell of lot less macho IYKWI