Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

Mazda MX5

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-05-2012, 06:49 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Spies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The Lake District
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Mazda MX5

Thinking about changing car, whilst there's nothing particularly wrong with the S I fancy a change, the only car that currently appeals to me (and is affordable) is the MX5 but it has to be the latest face lifted model with 2.0l engine else it might be a bit of a snore-fest.

Has anyone taken this route? Am I actually clinically insane for considering it?
Old 03-05-2012, 06:57 AM
  #2  

 
s2k4tony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: In the land of pies and pasties
Posts: 2,641
Received 133 Likes on 114 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spies
Thinking about changing car, whilst there's nothing particularly wrong with the S I fancy a change, the only car that currently appeals to me (and is affordable) is the MX5 but it has to be the latest face lifted model with 2.0l engine else it might be a bit of a snore-fest.

Has anyone taken this route? Am I actually clinically insane for considering it?
Completely
Old 03-05-2012, 07:29 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
hazzaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Bournemouth, Dorset
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I moved from a 2.0 Sport NC (Mk3) Mx-5 to the S2k.

I do miss it slightly. 160 horses and pretty skinny tyres were a lot of fun. You could chuck it round corners and roundabouts, slide the back out and feel 100% in control and know exactly what the car was doing underneath. The feel through the wheel and chassis was 10 times better than the s2k.

It did have its problems though. Wrong geometry from the factory is a common problem (they were jacked up on bigger springs for the euro market but the geo was set at the factory on the JDM springs) either have the geo set correctly (WIM do loads of NC Mx5's and are happy to share the settings that work best! Ask for Tony - he hasn't seen a factory MX5 where the geo has been correct!) or you can stick it on Eibach springs and the drop brings the geo in spec. Blocked drain pipes and flooded cabins are a common problem.

It's not a fast car. It'll get to 62 in about 8 seconds with a full tank and the engine is pretty boring. It's a Mazda badged Ford Duratec unit and doesn't really have any character. It'll also only return 30 odd MPG driving like a granny. I haven't noticed that I spend any more on petrol in the s2. There are very few aftermarket parts out there. K&N do a generic induction kit and Milltek do an exhaust but that's about it. The Cosworth supercharger never really caught on as it just threw rods through the block. The seats are also crap. They don't really offer any support. Although after 3 years the leather looked as good as new.

The Sport has Bilstein dampers, LSD, leather and is 6 speed rather than 5 in the normal 2.0. Tax is also a bracket higher in the Sport due to the gear ratio’s causing higher emissions for whatever test the government run.

Facelift cars (Mk3.5) have an extra 500 rpm and an 'intake sound pipe' into the cabin to give better induction noise.

I think on balance I prefer the s2k. If I could have the feel of the MX-5 and the drivetrain from the s2k I think I would never need to change cars in the future!

If you have any other questions, I’ll do my best to answer!
Old 03-05-2012, 08:22 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Penelope Ptistop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lincs
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nothing wrong with the MX5 (I had one before the S.) I would consider it a downgrade though, V slow in comparison and generally not as sporty.

Depends what you want, if you want to save money the MX5 isn't a bad idea. If finances aren't your main reason then yep, you're clinically insane in the membrane!
Old 03-05-2012, 10:21 AM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Spies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The Lake District
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thanks for the replies.
Old 03-05-2012, 10:29 AM
  #6  

 
unclefester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 13,336
Received 179 Likes on 145 Posts
Default

Mk1 MX5 with some FI fun
Old 03-05-2012, 10:45 AM
  #7  

 
Hedropsforglory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Moreton-in-Marsh
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spies
Thinking about changing car, whilst there's nothing particularly wrong with the S I fancy a change, the only car that currently appeals to me (and is affordable) is the MX5 but it has to be the latest face lifted model with 2.0l engine else it might be a bit of a snore-fest.
You mean the one deliberately styled to look like and S?

I'd say that any MX-5 is a backward step from an S but none of them are poor cars by any means, and cheaper to run than the S - I'd actually say that the latest MX is more likely to be a snorefest than the lighter, more bare-bones earlier models - the pre-05 1.8 would be my pick for cheap, chucking fun.

But any of them will feels slow compared to the S, all of them are less handsome and (at the risk of stating the obvious) bugger all happens at 6.5k on the tach - I couldn't do it now.
Old 03-05-2012, 11:29 AM
  #8  

 
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Hertford
Posts: 31,183
Likes: 0
Received 58 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

It'd be going in reverse for me.

But I think the NA cars are absolutely the dog's nuts. Shame about the fragility of the NC's engines, though.

Be interestong to see how they stack up agains the AS (that's a GT 8 6!)
Old 03-05-2012, 10:27 PM
  #9  
Registered User

 
jellyfishfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris Harris
I moved from a 2.0 Sport NC (Mk3) Mx-5 to the S2k.

It's a Mazda badged Ford Duratec unit
I always thought it to be the other way about, is the Duratec not based on the twin cam Mazda engine?

When you look at new car prices of Golfs and the like the MX5 looks very good value, especially after the large discounts that are available.

I tried to get my wife to buy one a few years back but no, maybe I'll try again in a couple of years or so.
Old 03-06-2012, 12:21 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
hazzaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Bournemouth, Dorset
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jellyfishfield
It's a Mazda badged Ford Duratec unit

I always thought it to be the other way about, is the Duratec not based on the twin cam Mazda engine?
Pretty much.

Ford bought the Mazda MZR design, turned it into the duratec and sold it back to Mazda.


Quick Reply: Mazda MX5



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:26 AM.