Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

Fun tow car

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-04-2006, 03:21 AM
  #21  
Registered User

 
Busamav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: England
Posts: 3,318
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I suspect that if you tow with a 3 series you will have some very " exciting moments "

Whilst it may have the tug , the handling will be less than perfect imho.

I tow with a T5 , my daughters S60 d5 does an equally good job but with much better fuel consumption
Old 09-04-2006, 04:23 AM
  #22  
SBC
Registered User
 
SBC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How about a Nissan 350Z . Easier to drive than the S2000, good torque, nice V6, Japanese, so the build qualitiy will be good and it's not a BMW.

SBC
Old 09-04-2006, 05:09 AM
  #23  
Registered User
 
joper90's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: bath
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I got a accord type-s 52 plate with 20K miles for 10K.. its quite sporty.. and is amsuing to drive.


/but no.. its not the s
Old 09-05-2006, 01:27 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
steve_the_greek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Forest
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Busamav,Sep 4 2006, 11:21 AM
I suspect that if you tow with a 3 series you will have some very " exciting moments "

Whilst it may have the tug , the handling will be less than perfect imho.

I tow with a T5 , my daughters S60 d5 does an equally good job but with much better fuel consumption
I think I'd take a 3 series over a T5 if it was down to handling. If you're worried about losing it due to the RWD, although bimmers are a bit sparse on the gizmo front, they do come with DSC. I would also have thought (assuming you're not getting a 4WD Volvo) that traction whilst towing would be better with RWD with the added weight over the rear axle.

...

ge2, if the Subaru interior doesn't put you off, then it might not be that daft a proposition. You'll get more car for your money that a 3 series - money that would offset the poor economy. I'd do my sums though...
Old 09-05-2006, 01:36 PM
  #25  
Registered User

 
Busamav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: England
Posts: 3,318
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by steve_the_greek,Sep 5 2006, 09:27 PM
I think I'd take a 3 series over a T5 if it was down to handling. If you're worried about losing it due to the RWD, although bimmers are a bit sparse on the gizmo front, they do come with DSC. I would also have thought (assuming you're not getting a 4WD Volvo) that traction whilst towing would be better with RWD with the added weight over the rear axle.

...

ge2, if the Subaru interior doesn't put you off, then it might not be that daft a proposition. You'll get more car for your money that a 3 series - money that would offset the poor economy. I'd do my sums though...


If you wish to tow anything of substance with a 3 series it will handle like a pig in any testing conditions , regardless of its ability to tug the load .

Next to a proper 4x4 i dont think the T5 will be beaten, I have towed lots of trailers , caravans and horse trailers .
Its a totally different ball game with a load behind you .

There are so many guys here who will one day fall in shock when a T5 lashes them . Dont underestimate them folks or you are queuing up for a lashing .
Old 09-05-2006, 02:12 PM
  #26  
Registered User
 
steve_the_greek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Forest
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm not gonna claim to be a towing expert, but I'm intrigued to know how a FWD car makes a better towing car than a RWD one. I just would have thought that with more weight over the rear, that would be a better place to put the power down. The number of times I've seen poorly loaded caravans attached to the back of cooking V70s and the like with their nose in the air going nowhere spinning their front wheels in the gravel in the campsite near our house. I know that's simple operator failure but I guess it's just clouded my judgement.
Old 09-06-2006, 12:03 AM
  #27  
Registered User
 
dreamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Surrey
Posts: 11,493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gaddafi,Sep 4 2006, 10:09 AM
I couldn't live with a Subaru interior unless the car was very cheap
The new Subaru interior's are fine - on a par with other cars I've test driven recently. The 2.5 was quite a surprise with respect to comfort etc.
Old 09-25-2006, 01:35 AM
  #28  
ge2
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
ge2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leigh-On-Sea
Posts: 5,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thought I'd dig this one up again, haven't had time to do anything about it yet

Any thoughts on the reliablility of a
Old 09-25-2006, 01:42 AM
  #29  
Banned
 
gaddafi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Survivalist enclave
Posts: 31,755
Received 69 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=ge2,Sep 25 2006, 09:35 AM] Thought I'd dig this one up again, haven't had time to do anything about it yet

Any thoughts on the reliablility of a
Old 09-25-2006, 02:19 AM
  #30  
ge2
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
ge2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leigh-On-Sea
Posts: 5,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Good advice, thanks.

As it's quite obvious I don't really know what I want, a


Quick Reply: Fun tow car



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:19 AM.