Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

The best internal combustion engine

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-26-2017 | 12:15 AM
  #1  
Soggybottomboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 641
Likes: 27
From: North Lancs
Default The best internal combustion engine

Will be the one you have now! Based on the government now about to announce the banning of all new sales of petrol and diesel cars and vans from 2040. What manufacturer is going to invest millions in new engine development when it will be scrapped in 20 years?
All new investment is going to be in more efficient battery storage and electric motors or hydrogen powered system.
The generation in their early teens now will be the last to briefly be petrol heads.
We are the last of an era, many will say "and a good thing too."
Old 07-26-2017 | 03:41 AM
  #2  
fluffyninja's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 14,273
Likes: 2
From: Chester
Default

http://sniffpetrol.com/2017/07/26/by.../#.WXh_Fk2QwdU


A typical engine life cycle is around 10 years so 23 years is 2 engine generations away.
Plus the UK is a pretty small car market on a global scale.
Reckon the yanks will have them for a few years more than that
Old 07-26-2017 | 06:40 AM
  #3  
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,183
Likes: 58
From: Hertford
Default

It's the French and the Chinese too and our Glorious Leaders are me-tooing them.

They cannot plan for next week, let alone a generation away.
Old 07-26-2017 | 07:22 AM
  #4  
Heinz '57's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,907
Likes: 70
From: Lincolnshire Wolds
Default

At 70 years old I dont give a shit!
Old 07-26-2017 | 07:29 AM
  #5  
arsie's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 11,525
Likes: 241
From: Sunny Norf*ck
Default

Me too Might stop by and help with tasting a few rums

edit: As there is a lurking green side to me we looked at the Smart electric when Carol was choosing. Range? (max) - 80 miles. She gets worried when the gauge show only 3 bars of 8 which is approx 90 miles left. So guess what, she chose petrol.
Old 07-26-2017 | 07:47 AM
  #6  
lovegroova's Avatar
UK Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 24,763
Likes: 307
From: Herts
Default

The thing is, a Tesla's performance and range would be more than fine for my needs right now. The cost of them is really the only barrier to me getting one (and I don't really want something that large). The Model 3 does not have sufficient range, however.

I have no doubt that the range of electric cars will continue to improve and they will be entirely viable.

The main problem is the charging infrastructure and whether generating capabilities can be improved to cope with the additional demand.
Old 07-26-2017 | 08:22 AM
  #7  
richmc's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 8,105
Likes: 85
From: Costa del Cornwall
Default

Originally Posted by arsie
Me too Might stop by and help with tasting a few rums

edit: As there is a lurking green side to me we looked at the Smart electric when Carol was choosing. Range? (max) - 80 miles. She gets worried when the gauge show only 3 bars of 8 which is approx 90 miles left. So guess what, she chose petrol.
And me, the only electric vehicle I'll have will be a mobility scooter. Anyway there will be umpteen different governments and policies before then, rebellious manufactures so as a lot of press are saying it will probably never happen unless the oil runs out.
Old 07-26-2017 | 08:41 AM
  #8  
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,183
Likes: 58
From: Hertford
Default

Originally Posted by lovegroova
The thing is, a Tesla's performance and range would be more than fine for my needs right now. The cost of them is really the only barrier to me getting one (and I don't really want something that large). The Model 3 does not have sufficient range, however.

I have no doubt that the range of electric cars will continue to improve and they will be entirely viable.

The main problem is the charging infrastructure and whether generating capabilities can be improved to cope with the additional demand.
Toyota is hoping to have an EV with solid-state (dry cell) batteries in production by 2020.

That ought to be a major breakthrough viz mass and charging time.

EVs may not be as useless as they now currently (sorry!) appear.
Old 07-26-2017 | 10:27 PM
  #9  
ianl's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 7,653
Likes: 4
From: The Beautiful South
Default

Given the improvements in EV's over the last 5 or 6 years, and the increasing manufacturer support for them now, I have little doubt that in 20-odd years they will be entirely viable.
Old 07-27-2017 | 01:26 AM
  #10  
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,183
Likes: 58
From: Hertford
Default

Indeed - it's always been the laws of physics that have made EVs useless other than as milk floats. Even most of those are Diseasel these days...

However, better quantum understanding means that the laws of physics may in part be wrong and nanotechnology may increase power density and prevent rapid cycling of the battery overheating its terminals.

Which just leaves the charging infrastructure to be sorted out.


Quick Reply: The best internal combustion engine



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:42 AM.