Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Your choice for affordable daily driver/track car?

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-17-2010, 08:34 AM
  #41  

 
coldrsx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 3,660
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

....this thread is funny.


S2000 is IMO one of the few 'true' race on sunday go to work on monday cars out there at an affordable price range.
Old 01-17-2010, 01:39 PM
  #42  
Registered User
 
mikey stone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

By design, stock street cars are a terrible way to enjoy a race track. IMO, there are only a handful of (affordable) cars that are capable of daily driving and still offer terrific performance on a race track.

- Integra Type R

- E36 M3

- Evo IX

- Z06

- 996 GT3

Yes, any car can be driven around a race track, but very few street cars were optimized for that type of droving.
Old 01-17-2010, 03:26 PM
  #43  
Registered User
 
08YellowCR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well if not the CR than i would get a Evo. But i feel u on DD the CR. It was geting old to me seemed like i enjoyed the car less. So i just bought a beater for $450 now the CR seems like a super car
Old 01-17-2010, 04:01 PM
  #44  
Registered User
 
Race's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris S,Jan 16 2010, 06:14 PM
Yes.

Obviously, it doesn't have the same power, but it handles better. Most importantly, it doesn't have any oiling or power steering failure issues that 987's are susceptible to.

Consumables are another huge difference. Tires are much cheaper, as are brake pads, and light weight means they're relatively easy on them all things considered.

I didn't think CS maint. was too expensive for street use, but those extended intervals become irrelevant when tracking your car much, and suddenly $230+ oil changes become a lot more expensive. My last NC oil change was $24.95 (DIY) using Castrol Synthetic and a good filter.

Also, the NC is easy to work on. I never did any of my own maintenance on the CS - just having to use pucks @ the jacking points, having to get the car level to drain the oil, poor engine access, etc., made it not very inviting to wrench on.

Lastly, my insurance company eliminated on-track coverage from my policy, and I can stomach the financial risk of losing my Miata much more easily than the CS.

I dearly loved my CS, but my NC has hung well against the ones I've encountered on the track. I will say that the CS is a better DD than the NC or S2000 (and most other 2 seat sports cars) IMO...more comfortable/spacious, better seats, quieter, more grunt, etc.
NC Miata better handling than a Cayman S?

Granted, I've never driven a Cayman S, but I did own a 987 Boxster S for a year and I've driven an NC...it's not even close. The NC is a damn fine car, don't get me wrong, but better handling than a Cayman? Come on, that's a joke.

I can't disagree with anything else you said, though, except for the ride. I found the NC very soft. I never found my Boxster uncomfortable, but then again, I find very little uncomfortable due to stiffness.
Old 01-17-2010, 04:26 PM
  #45  
Registered User

 
PedalFaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 6,014
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Race,Jan 17 2010, 05:01 PM
The NC is a damn fine car, don't get me wrong, but better handling than a Cayman? Come on, that's a joke.
You're telling a guy who's owned and tracked both cars that he doesn't know what he's talking about when you haven't owned either?

Having said that, Chris' Miata has a number of handling modifications which improve its handling compared to stock.

Also, different people have different definitions of ideal handling -- for example, I prefer a pushier car than some of my racing buddies, so it's possible for us to disagree on whether one car is better handling than another. Not that most people know the difference between handling and skidpad rating anyway.
Old 01-17-2010, 05:07 PM
  #46  
Registered User
 
Race's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PedalFaster,Jan 17 2010, 05:26 PM
You're telling a guy who's owned and tracked both cars that he doesn't know what he's talking about when you haven't owned either?

Having said that, Chris' Miata has a number of handling modifications which improve its handling compared to stock.

Also, different people have different definitions of ideal handling -- for example, I prefer a pushier car than some of my racing buddies, so it's possible for us to disagree on whether one car is better handling than another. Not that most people know the difference between handling and skidpad rating anyway.
Well, modified handling is something different. I hadn't realized he'd changed the car, but stock to stock, the NC can't touch it.

And I do know the difference between handling and skidpad ratings (skidpads don't mean a damn thing, we both know that), so that's irrelevant. I've done my fair share of driving, research, and writing (I don't know if anyone's familiar with Automobear.com; we were a small, but enthusiastic group)

It's true that handling can be somewhat subjective. Some people may like the neutral balance of a front engine, rear drive car, some people may prefer the sharper, more responsive, and, at times, trickier handling of a mid-engine car, but there are things that true and things that are not. You can't say that a Crown Victoria handles better than a Ferrari 430 because you're more comfortable driving the Crown Vic.

However, I did suspect that driver comfort has a lot to do with his assessment. The NC's limits are far lower and more accessible than those of a Boxster or Cayman, and when coupled with its lower replacement cost, as mentioned, the extra driver confidence could lead one to feel that one car is better for track use. I know I wouldn't have been comfortable tracking my Boxster S when I had it. I'm shopping for a cheaper car for racing for exactly that reason.

But, either way, your point is taken; I forgot my new guy on the forum politicking.
Old 01-17-2010, 05:53 PM
  #47  
Former Moderator

 
CKit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,730
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Don't feel bad, you couldn't have know how much Chris loves his Miata. He's like a semi-sane ZX-7 talking about rotaries...
Old 01-17-2010, 06:08 PM
  #48  
Registered User
 
Race's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's understandable, completely. MX-5s are great cars, even the NC (much like the Evo X, it has sacrificed a little sharpness in the name of comfort). I pushed one up to triple digits on an on-ramp a few years back, when they were first introduced.

From a cost/benefit perspective, the MX-5 is hard to beat. That's why "NA Miata" is the first thing to come out when someone asks "What should I buy?" over at the Grassroots Motorsports forums.
Old 01-17-2010, 06:13 PM
  #49  

 
DanZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Fort Bragg, NC
Posts: 28,633
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by CKit,Jan 17 2010, 09:53 PM
He's like a semi-sane ZX-7 talking about rotaries...
"Race" is a new member with Zero days under his belt. He has no idea what you are talking about when you talk about ZX-7 and RX-7s
Old 01-17-2010, 06:17 PM
  #50  
Registered User
 
Race's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DanZilla,Jan 17 2010, 07:13 PM
"Race" is a new member with Zero days under his belt. He has no idea what you are talking about when you talk about ZX-7 and RX-7s
It wasn't a giant leap, based on the handle.


Quick Reply: Your choice for affordable daily driver/track car?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:20 AM.