Why is the new CTR so slow?
12-19-2017, 08:04 AM
#131
I saw my first CTR in black, actually being driven, on the weekend and it looked pretty good, I thought. For starters, it didn't look as big but it also looked more sinister and purposeful than I imagined. The crazy aero wasn't as obvious or in-your-face, which was kind of nice as well.
12-19-2017, 10:19 AM
#132
The CTR is not meant to compete with M2/Mustang GT/Camaro SS. If it is, Honda would of priced it like them . The dealership up-charge is basic supply and demand and not due to its performance. Because for the first time ever you can buy a brand new CTR direct from a local dealership in NA as there are a lot of pent up demand and dealerships are cashing in on it.
Most of us here won't pay the upcharge (myself included if I were to buy one). But no one can deny the fact critics all agree and lots of people are willing to pay the upcharge because it is an awesome car with great performance and offers practicality as a daily as well. Otherwise, there wouldn't be an upcharge to begin with.
Most of us here won't pay the upcharge (myself included if I were to buy one). But no one can deny the fact critics all agree and lots of people are willing to pay the upcharge because it is an awesome car with great performance and offers practicality as a daily as well. Otherwise, there wouldn't be an upcharge to begin with.
12-19-2017, 10:22 AM
#133
Registered User
I saw my first CTR in black, actually being driven, on the weekend and it looked pretty good, I thought. For starters, it didn't look as big but it also looked more sinister and purposeful than I imagined. The crazy aero wasn't as obvious or in-your-face, which was kind of nice as well.
12-19-2017, 11:22 AM
#134
Upon closer reading, I wasn't paying attention and was just going by what JonBoy had posted and the prices are in CAD not USD. Either way, both GT and SS start at around $36k which is still alot more than CTR after you add options. My point is if you are cross shopping and prefer the Mustang/Camaro combo then the CTR is not for you.
12-19-2017, 11:27 AM
#135
12-19-2017, 09:51 PM
#136
12-20-2017, 03:46 AM
#137
lol to who, You?
How are They useless as actual cars? That statement makes no sense...If you're making this comment based on seating does that make the S2K useless as an actual car as well?
Perhaps even more so, both the Mustang and the Camaro actually have back seats, though tight they are, they're there...and they happen to fold down, giving both a pretty decent amount of storage space...How is that useless?
Not everyone has a family that needs 4 doors.
How are They useless as actual cars? That statement makes no sense...If you're making this comment based on seating does that make the S2K useless as an actual car as well?
Perhaps even more so, both the Mustang and the Camaro actually have back seats, though tight they are, they're there...and they happen to fold down, giving both a pretty decent amount of storage space...How is that useless?
Not everyone has a family that needs 4 doors.
12-20-2017, 04:59 AM
#138
Registered User
They're not as useful as a hatchback but I wouldn't call it "useless".
I do believe the S2000 is useless as actual cars tbh lol. I love my S2000 but there are times where if the S2000 was my only car, it would be hard to do some of the stuff I needed to do.
But the Mustang and the Camaro has a lot more space so I don't believe it to be useless as actual cars. Just not as useful as a wagon/hatchback.
But the Mustang and the Camaro has a lot more space so I don't believe it to be useless as actual cars. Just not as useful as a wagon/hatchback.
12-20-2017, 05:23 AM
#140
Registered User
It's great that there are many choices in the 35k range now to suit a wide variety of people.