Why look for a used NSX?
02-27-2006, 06:06 PM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: from the CHii
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
02-27-2006, 06:22 PM
#2
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: south Florida
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah it's nice but somehow I don't think it will be as reliable as an nsx you can get for 48k. If I were a mechanic or was only going to drive maybe 100 miles/month I'd consider one (and if I could afford it : )
30k miles is a lot for a ferrari, and to me no airbags is a no go and looks dated
EDIT- sorry I meant a car without airbags to me makes the interior dated. The outside is still very pretty imo, but to me not worth the extra $.
30k miles is a lot for a ferrari, and to me no airbags is a no go and looks dated
EDIT- sorry I meant a car without airbags to me makes the interior dated. The outside is still very pretty imo, but to me not worth the extra $.
02-27-2006, 06:37 PM
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Luke530,Feb 27 2006, 07:06 PM
ROFL!in all seriousness the 348 is a nice car, but for the $$$ a f355 would be more worth it,
i've heard from ferrari owners that you should budget about $1 / mile for maintainence costs.
02-27-2006, 08:17 PM
#6
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Any Ferrari would cost mucho $$$$ to up keep, and up keep you would, a lot. We are spoild, the NSX is the first super car to not come with super car needs. I'd chose an NSX over this Ferrari any day. Only people I see driving 348s don't look like Ferrari owners. The last one I saw had a guy that looked like Yanni driving the poor thing.
Sam
Sam
02-27-2006, 08:20 PM
#7
Registered User
I can think of a number of reasons
1) I wouldn't pay 48k for a 16 year old car.
2) The 348 isn't exactly the most beautiful Ferrari.
3) The NSX would be cheaper to maintain (and you could get a 3.2 litre 6 speed in that 50k area, thus making the car under 10 years old)
1) I wouldn't pay 48k for a 16 year old car.
2) The 348 isn't exactly the most beautiful Ferrari.
3) The NSX would be cheaper to maintain (and you could get a 3.2 litre 6 speed in that 50k area, thus making the car under 10 years old)
Trending Topics
02-27-2006, 08:24 PM
#8
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BPUKiller,Feb 27 2006, 09:17 PM
Any Ferrari would cost mucho $$$$ to up keep, and up keep you would, a lot. We are spoild, the NSX is the first super car to not come with super car needs. I'd chose an NSX over this Ferrari any day. Only people I see driving 348s don't look like Ferrari owners. The last one I saw had a guy that looked like Yanni driving the poor thing.
Sam
Sam
