Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Why do people assume bigger is better?

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-12-2005, 09:57 AM
  #21  
Registered User

 
koala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 7,731
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by hotknives,Mar 12 2005, 11:38 AM
sports car will fit 3 people or under (remember the Mclaren F1)
race cars are for one person (the driver, and maybe the navigator as in rally racing)
family cars have a capacity of 4 or more people
So the Ferrari 2+2 isn't a sports car?
Old 03-12-2005, 11:58 AM
  #22  
Registered User
 
b0mbrman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: CA.WA.[TX].VA
Posts: 2,657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PorkRind,Mar 11 2005, 04:41 PM
A-f'ing-men! For driving enjoyment, I believe that smaller is almost always better. I'd probably still be motorcycle-only if it weren't for all the bozo drivers that were out to kill me. I'd own a Caterham if I thought my wife would ride in it.
I feel the same way about motorcycles and wonder why car companies don't market cars toward single, 20-somethings like myself who would buy a bike if it weren't for the dying...

Despite all the speed, they share many features with the super-practical car I want that doesn't exist:
* Easy to park
* Great gas mileage
* Has all the seating I need for 99% of my driving (I also have a weekend car)
* Relatively inexpensive insurance
* Lightweight fun
Old 03-12-2005, 01:01 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
Ooalloems2koO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Rowland Heights 626
Posts: 6,912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

well ex gf told me size does really matter so i gues it matters
Old 03-12-2005, 01:06 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
steve c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,792
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

So the Ferrari 2+2 isn't a sports car?
More of a GT.

Regardless his logic is in my view flawed. Because my 911 turbo has 4 seats it is now a family car -- the same for the Ferrari? Yeah okay.
Old 03-12-2005, 03:13 PM
  #25  
Registered User

 
Warren J. Dew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Posts: 1,135
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by steve c,Mar 12 2005, 10:17 AM
Define crazy. The kid likes acceleration, it makes her laugh. Why should I have to suffer through the experience of driving an Accord, Camry etc just because I want to carry more than 2 people in the vehicle?
Hmm ... sounds like a good reason to have kids. "Honey, now that we have kids, I need a back seat - okay if I buy a 911?"
Old 03-12-2005, 03:38 PM
  #26  

 
Emil St-Hilaire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: St-Redempteur,Qc.
Posts: 21,997
Received 469 Likes on 400 Posts
Default

Bigger cars have better handling;
It's called ''Road hugging weight''
Old 03-12-2005, 06:42 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
Mars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Emil St-Hilaire,Mar 12 2005, 04:38 PM
Bigger cars have better handling;
It's called ''Road hugging weight''
more like "road hogging weight"...
Old 03-12-2005, 07:06 PM
  #28  
Registered User
 
UKXotics's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by steve c,Mar 12 2005, 02:06 PM
More of a GT.

Regardless his logic is in my view flawed. Because my 911 turbo has 4 seats it is now a family car -- the same for the Ferrari? Yeah okay.
Eh... *MY* 911 isn't a family car.. I dunno how much my C4 cab gives up to Steve's turbo (presumably?) hardtop, but there's a world of difference between my 911 and my honda civic Maybe the turbo is useful because it can haul kids and still be quick even with the added weight
Old 03-13-2005, 05:18 AM
  #29  
rai
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
rai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: mount airy
Posts: 7,981
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Maybe I can answer my own question.

Bigger = bigger HP = bigger top speed.

I'm thinking about the Bugatti or ME412 can go 240-250 mph

I'm sure most owners won't ever go that fast but it's great for bragging.


A track car may be faster (around the track) with a lower top speed b/c of tight gearing. I'm thinking about the 911 GT3 CS; I read it's top speed due to gearing is like 169mph. A supercar is more about top speed than track time (in general).
Old 03-13-2005, 10:25 AM
  #30  
Registered User
 
Mars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rai,Mar 13 2005, 06:18 AM
Maybe I can answer my own question.

Bigger = bigger HP = bigger top speed.

I'm thinking about the Bugatti or ME412 can go 240-250 mph

I'm sure most owners won't ever go that fast but it's great for bragging.


A track car may be faster (around the track) with a lower top speed b/c of tight gearing. I'm thinking about the 911 GT3 CS; I read it's top speed due to gearing is like 169mph. A supercar is more about top speed than track time (in general).
well the Bugatti isn't that big a car length-wise (though it's very wide), it's less than an inch away from a 350Z
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
asiliat
Car and Bike Talk
39
05-05-2010 09:54 AM
jhp012
Car and Bike Talk
27
05-08-2007 06:28 AM
WarrenW
Car and Bike Talk
11
10-03-2006 10:29 AM
JettaGT
Car and Bike Talk
6
04-05-2005 04:07 AM



Quick Reply: Why do people assume bigger is better?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:29 AM.