what to buy after 944 & S2000?
07-31-2009, 06:17 AM
#13
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: █ SF, CA █
Posts: 16,702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The funny thing is that none of these seem like a natural progression from a 944 and S2000. So unless you no longer want a light, small car, I would consider another s2k(lease buyback probably won't be the best deal).
But yeah, priorities change over time... Still have the Accord?
I don't know how the reliabilty was on the 944, but I wouldn't want to own any of these other cars out of warranty either...
But yeah, priorities change over time... Still have the Accord?
I don't know how the reliabilty was on the 944, but I wouldn't want to own any of these other cars out of warranty either...
07-31-2009, 07:25 AM
#15
None of the others mentioned could be considered even close to "light weight".
RX-8? Not "quick" by modern standards, but not a slouch by S2000/944 standards.
RX-8? Not "quick" by modern standards, but not a slouch by S2000/944 standards.
07-31-2009, 08:36 AM
#18
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Easton
Posts: 5,642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Without knowing your budget, the Evo X fits your requirements - light, quick, paddle shifters, carries 4.
E36 or E46 M3s might also fit, but with potentially higher ownership costs.
E36 or E46 M3s might also fit, but with potentially higher ownership costs.
07-31-2009, 08:49 AM
#19
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by fezz,Jul 30 2009, 07:28 PM
i want light and quick
carry 4
carry 4
07-31-2009, 08:52 AM
#20
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: █ SF, CA █
Posts: 16,702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dr. WOT,Jul 31 2009, 09:36 AM
the Evo X fits your requirements - light
http://www.edmunds.com/new/2008/mitsubishi...8945/specs.html
Weights practically as much as a(also not light) G37 at 3581 lbs.
Even this car from 1964 weighs less than those two:
