what to buy after 944 & S2000?
#13
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: █ SF, CA █
Posts: 16,702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The funny thing is that none of these seem like a natural progression from a 944 and S2000. So unless you no longer want a light, small car, I would consider another s2k(lease buyback probably won't be the best deal).
But yeah, priorities change over time... Still have the Accord?
I don't know how the reliabilty was on the 944, but I wouldn't want to own any of these other cars out of warranty either...
But yeah, priorities change over time... Still have the Accord?
I don't know how the reliabilty was on the 944, but I wouldn't want to own any of these other cars out of warranty either...
#15
None of the others mentioned could be considered even close to "light weight".
RX-8? Not "quick" by modern standards, but not a slouch by S2000/944 standards.
RX-8? Not "quick" by modern standards, but not a slouch by S2000/944 standards.
#18
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Easton
Posts: 5,642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Without knowing your budget, the Evo X fits your requirements - light, quick, paddle shifters, carries 4.
E36 or E46 M3s might also fit, but with potentially higher ownership costs.
E36 or E46 M3s might also fit, but with potentially higher ownership costs.
#19
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by fezz,Jul 30 2009, 07:28 PM
i want light and quick
carry 4
carry 4
#20
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: █ SF, CA █
Posts: 16,702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dr. WOT,Jul 31 2009, 09:36 AM
the Evo X fits your requirements - light
http://www.edmunds.com/new/2008/mitsubishi...8945/specs.html
Weights practically as much as a(also not light) G37 at 3581 lbs.
Even this car from 1964 weighs less than those two: