VW GTi vs Civic Si
#21
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by slicksilver,Mar 3 2006, 08:05 AM
Not sure where you're getting your facts about discounts on the GTi. I certainly haven't seen any.
Base GTI:
http://www.edmunds.com/new/2006/volkswagen...s.html?action=2
Base SI:
http://www.edmunds.com/new/2006/honda/civi...s.html?action=2
Where I live (Bay Area) the Civic Si sells for 2k above msrp whereas the GTI sells around 1k below MSRP. I used http://www.carsdirect.com to get the pricing for my area code. I find that site to be pretty accurate (within a few hundred bucks or so).
#22
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by slicksilver,Mar 3 2006, 08:05 AM
My Honda dealer still marks up their S2000's by $5K. In fact, they have a 'market adjustment' on each model they sell. So a base Civic is marked up by around 3K.
So its just dealer hype.
#23
Registered User
Originally Posted by steve c,Mar 3 2006, 12:12 AM
Wait -- an idiot fanboy with no real experience chiming in with a bullshit comment on a Honda board? Wow! Surprise!
X2.
This board has really lowered the average enthusiast level in the past 2-3 years. So many clueless tools. If it's not a Honda it sucks! My parents who could only afford Hondas told me so!!!
X2.
This board has really lowered the average enthusiast level in the past 2-3 years. So many clueless tools. If it's not a Honda it sucks! My parents who could only afford Hondas told me so!!!
#24
The ads for the VW are definately better. Especially when they bash up the ricer cars. "German engineering,yo."
If it were to be my only car I'd go VW because the turbo will be more fun day to day. If it were for my second car I'd pick the civic because I THINK it would be more reliable and the milage will be better. (don't quote me EPA ratings and say they are close, if you have owned a turbo car and use boost EPA ratings go down the toilet. NA cars will go to the edge of lean to get more power, FI (stock ecu) cars will dump huge amounts of fuel at high boost to prevent knock and protect the warranties) I would be on boost more that I would ring out the high rpm in the civic too because I can't take the racket that much with a closed ceiling. I hate driving the S with the top up.
If it were to be my only car I'd go VW because the turbo will be more fun day to day. If it were for my second car I'd pick the civic because I THINK it would be more reliable and the milage will be better. (don't quote me EPA ratings and say they are close, if you have owned a turbo car and use boost EPA ratings go down the toilet. NA cars will go to the edge of lean to get more power, FI (stock ecu) cars will dump huge amounts of fuel at high boost to prevent knock and protect the warranties) I would be on boost more that I would ring out the high rpm in the civic too because I can't take the racket that much with a closed ceiling. I hate driving the S with the top up.
#25
Registered User
Originally Posted by rai,Mar 3 2006, 06:32 AM
The thing is, you can get a GTI with a slushbox (DSG) which a lot of people prefer. This is said to be one of the best engine/tranny combos around today.
Doesn't the GTI have a true automatic option, too?0
#26
Originally Posted by steve c,Mar 3 2006, 03:12 AM
Wait -- an idiot fanboy with no real experience chiming in with a bullshit comment on a Honda board? Wow! Surprise!
#29
Registered User
Originally Posted by Karl O.,Mar 3 2006, 12:52 PM
So, if all of my friends have sex with a girl, and she gives them all herpes, I guess I shouldn't listen to them, eh? Might as well bareback it, no way to learn anything except to experience it myself.
#30
Originally Posted by S2kracka,Mar 3 2006, 12:01 PM
Saw the new GTI yesterday on the road, its the first I've seen so far. Haven't spotted the new Si yet.