Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Viper fail

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-31-2010, 06:55 PM
  #21  
Registered User

 
PedalFaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 6,014
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by azn akira,Jan 31 2010, 07:41 PM
but abs doesn't do much for stopping distances on dry pavement.
It would be more accurate to say that ABS doesn't do much for stopping distances on dry pavement when compared to a competent driver threshold braking. Locking up the brakes, as the Viper's driver did, does not qualify as a competent driver threshold braking.
Old 01-31-2010, 07:05 PM
  #22  

 
Mr.E.G.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,280
Received 118 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by azn akira,Jan 31 2010, 07:41 PM
but abs doesn't do much for stopping distances on dry pavement. all abs does is allow you be able to steer the car. so even if he had abs he still probably would have had the accident
I think your understanding of ABS is off a bit. ABS wont make for better stopping distances on dry pavement compared to stopping the vehicle CORRECTLY.

Assume that a car can stop from 60-0 in 100 feet on dry pavement when a professional driver applies the perfect amount of pressure. He gets it to slow down as fast as possible without locking the wheels.

If you have someone try it in the same car with ABS activated, then yes, the braking distance will be more than the 100 feet.

BUT if you have someone lock the brakes up, the stopping distance is going to be considerably more than 100 feet.

They way you should look at it is that ABS will result in the mid point. It wont be as good as a perfectly executed braking maneuver, but it will certainly result in less stopping distance than a poorly executed braking maneuver.

Since this guy delivered a worst case scenario braking maneuver, I think it is safe to say that ABS would have helped shave off more speed and result in less of an impact.

PS. The guy driving that Viper is a douche bag who made his own bed. Had he not been showing off for camera guy, he would have been OK. I get it, I like driving fast too, but that's why there are race tracks or at least open roads.
Old 01-31-2010, 07:07 PM
  #23  

 
Mr.E.G.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,280
Received 118 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PedalFaster,Jan 31 2010, 07:55 PM
It would be more accurate to say that ABS doesn't do much for stopping distances on dry pavement when compared to a competent driver threshold braking. Locking up the brakes, as the Viper's driver did, does not qualify as a competent driver threshold braking.
Whoops. You beat me to it. lol.

I guess I should have read a bit further.
Old 02-01-2010, 06:07 AM
  #24  

 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 6,863
Received 124 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Regarding my prior comments regarding ABS vs. locked, and hitting the stopped van at xx mph vs. (xx-0.5mph), I couldn't have been more wrong. As someone above observed, the brakes were locked for something like 3 seconds. I ran the numbers assuming 0.9g decel for ABS and 0.72g for locked brakes, and a 60mph initial speed. After three seconds with the wheels locked, final speed is 12.5mph. With modulated threshold braking (whether via ABS or a talented and unrealistically reliable panic-stricken driver), final speed would be less than 1mph.

So I retract my earlier assessment, ABS (or talented driver threshold braking) may well indeed have prevented this particular accident, and certainly would have significantly reduced the impact speed.

But it's probably safe to say that a talented experienced driver wouldn't have been driving like an idiot in traffic in the first place...
Old 02-01-2010, 06:23 AM
  #25  

 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 6,863
Received 124 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Actually, I screwed up even worse than I thought, the difference in velocity at the point of the back of the van is MUCH greater than 12.5mph., because it is speed vs. DISTANCE that's important, not speed vs. time.

If the Viper hit the van at 12.5mph after braking from 60mph at .72g, distance covered is 160ft. In the modulated-braking case at .9g, the car could have come to a dead stop in 134 ft, 26 ft short!

So, yeah, I was WRONG.
Old 02-01-2010, 06:36 AM
  #26  
Registered User
 
tarheel91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZDan,Feb 1 2010, 11:23 AM
Actually, I screwed up even worse than I thought, the difference in velocity at the point of the back of the van is MUCH greater than 12.5mph., because it is speed vs. DISTANCE that's important, not speed vs. time.

If the Viper hit the van at 12.5mph after braking from 60mph at .72g, distance covered is 160ft. In the modulated-braking case at .9g, the car could have come to a dead stop in 134 ft, 26 ft short!

So, yeah, I was WRONG.
Your also off in terms of the difference in applied forces. The coefficient of static friction between rubber and asphalt is 1.2. The coefficient of dynamic friction is around .8 depending on conditions. Of course, that's for rubber in general, and doesn't take into consideration the type of tires or anything, but it's about as accurate as we're going to get. Still, using these, braking while maintaining static friction should yield around 1.5 times the force compared to braking while sliding. Assuming .9g is correct while under static friction, .6g would be closer to the real value while sliding.
Old 02-01-2010, 07:05 AM
  #27  

 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 6,863
Received 124 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tarheel91,Feb 1 2010, 07:36 AM
Your also off in terms of the difference in applied forces. The coefficient of static friction between rubber and asphalt is 1.2. The coefficient of dynamic friction is around .8 depending on conditions. Of course, that's for rubber in general, and doesn't take into consideration the type of tires or anything, but it's about as accurate as we're going to get. Still, using these, braking while maintaining static friction should yield around 1.5 times the force compared to braking while sliding. Assuming .9g is correct while under static friction, .6g would be closer to the real value while sliding.
For fully warmed up serious-performance street tires I'll give you 1.2 braking coefficient of friction. For cold tires, I bet 0.9 is closer.

Regarding sliding vs. non-sliding coefficients, it will depend heavily on the tires used and surface conditions. But I thought that in dry conditions for good modern high-performance street rubber, the dry sliding coefficient is closer to 80% than to 67% of non-sliding, but I'm open to any data resources you have
Old 02-01-2010, 07:37 AM
  #28  
Registered User

 
dammitjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: WI
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZDan,Feb 1 2010, 09:07 AM
But it's probably safe to say that a talented experienced driver wouldn't have been driving like an idiot in traffic in the first place...
Drivers can be talented, experienced and stupid all at the same time.
Old 02-01-2010, 07:46 AM
  #29  
Registered User

 
PedalFaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 6,014
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

One more thing on ABS versus competent drivers -- a competent driver who puts his mind to it can match or even exceed the performance of your average ABS system. However, it's one thing to threshold brake in a braking exercise on a closed track -- it's quite another thing to be zooming through traffic, listening to the radio, having a good time, and keeping one eye on your friend in the chase car, then be surprised and have an "oh sh*t" moment. It would take great presence of mind to threshold brake perfectly in the split second that would separate a close call from disaster -- I imagine even most skilled drivers would struggle to do it. On the other hand, almost anyone can stand on the brakes and let the ABS sort it out.

In summary: yay ABS.
Old 02-01-2010, 08:00 AM
  #30  
Registered User

 
Not Sure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZDan,Feb 1 2010, 07:07 AM
Regarding my prior comments regarding ABS vs. locked, and hitting the stopped van at xx mph vs. (xx-0.5mph), I couldn't have been more wrong. As someone above observed, the brakes were locked for something like 3 seconds. I ran the numbers assuming 0.9g decel for ABS and 0.72g for locked brakes, and a 60mph initial speed. After three seconds with the wheels locked, final speed is 12.5mph. With modulated threshold braking (whether via ABS or a talented and unrealistically reliable panic-stricken driver), final speed would be less than 1mph.

So I retract my earlier assessment, ABS (or talented driver threshold braking) may well indeed have prevented this particular accident, and certainly would have significantly reduced the impact speed.

But it's probably safe to say that a talented experienced driver wouldn't have been driving like an idiot in traffic in the first place...
Dude, just say "ABS > locked wheels".


Quick Reply: Viper fail



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:31 PM.