Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

VIDEO: BMW 1-series M Coupe Officially Revealed

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-08-2010, 03:38 PM
  #11  

 
Jumpman2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Posts: 1,076
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I think most of the sauce is in the suspension. And they did remove some of the belly sag, though not all. There are some still frames on 1addicts.com that show the car from the side. The oddest looking part to me is the rear, especially the lower half. It's very...busy.

As a former 135i owner, this car has me conflicted. It looks awesome, and I'm sure it will be, but I'd bet anything it will still be plagued with HPFP issues since it's still powered by the N54.

Also color options are really weak (black, white, orange).
Old 12-08-2010, 03:43 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
Steponme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,825
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by tarheel91,Dec 8 2010, 04:14 PM
Considering the base engine is underrated at 300 hp and most places are saying 340-350 hp, it's probably pretty competitive with those cars (assuming 320-330 at the wheels and the relatively flatter torque curve from a turboed engine). I know for a fact my car will easily take a base Corvette (I'm at 320 at the wheels and 3000 lbs), so this should be competitive assuming it's 10% heavier.

Every first drive has commented about the absence of understeer (one of the biggest complaints about the 1 series), so I'm willing to bet it'll take a corner pretty well. With a shorter wheelbase than the 3 series it should also feel more responsive and go-kart like in turn-in. I'm not saying it'll be better or worse than the competition, but I think it'll be competitive.
I doubt it'll be able to keep up with the Vette, considering the Vette traps 115mph in the 1/4mi. It'll kick the Boxster's butt for sure; my guess is it'll be as fast as the Cayman S. But, what I was saying is, being $45K (some people had said that) is right at the doors of those popular sports cars while looking like a cheap Sentra (subjective, of course).
Old 12-08-2010, 05:07 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
ziggy55's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: hawaii
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

oooohhh nice
Old 12-08-2010, 06:17 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
UKXotics's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tarheel91,Dec 8 2010, 04:14 PM
I know for a fact my car will easily take a base Corvette (I'm at 320 at the wheels and 3000 lbs), so this should be competitive assuming it's 10% heavier.
That's some crazy maths.
Old 12-08-2010, 06:31 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
dombey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Scottsdale
Posts: 2,330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

dunno I don't feel like I saw anything....almost like they're hiding it.
Maybe they couldn't fix the droopiness.
Old 12-08-2010, 08:08 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
tarheel91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by UKXotics,Dec 8 2010, 11:17 PM
That's some crazy maths.
That's not crazy maths. It's crazy reality. From about 55. It wasn't that close either.

Math works out too. 323 whp = 380 at the crank assuming 15% loss. Base corvette has 400 (assuming pre-2008). My Z4 weighs in right at 3000 with the supercharger. The C6 is 3200 lbs.

That means the C6 has 5.3% more power and 6.7% more weight. Factor in my FAR more aggressive gearing (thanks to 3.46 gears from the 3.0si vs. 3.07 stock) plus the literally flat torque curve, and it makes sense.
Old 12-08-2010, 08:58 PM
  #17  
Registered User

 
exb00st's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you're talking about the N54, it doesn't have a "literally flat" torque curve. It falls 80+ WHP at redline. The M3 has a flat TQ curve.
Old 12-08-2010, 09:01 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
Jacques79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I wonder how this will stack up against the Z4M performance wise.
Old 12-08-2010, 11:25 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
GinoGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,065
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 00S2K01S4,Dec 8 2010, 06:18 PM
Alrighty, was hoping to get the next GTI R (if VW brings it over) but I think this is going to be my next car w/ Competition pkg of course. Probably have to wait another year for that option to come out.
WTF? That's some interesting cross shopping. $35k or some retarded price for a VW, or another car that's like $10k-$15k more.
Old 12-09-2010, 01:00 AM
  #20  
Registered User
 
EVAN&MONICA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Portlandia
Posts: 22,535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tarheel91,Dec 8 2010, 09:08 PM
That's not crazy maths. It's crazy reality. From about 55. It wasn't that close either.

Math works out too. 323 whp = 380 at the crank assuming 15% loss. Base corvette has 400 (assuming pre-2008). My Z4 weighs in right at 3000 with the supercharger. The C6 is 3200 lbs.

That means the C6 has 5.3% more power and 6.7% more weight. Factor in my FAR more aggressive gearing (thanks to 3.46 gears from the 3.0si vs. 3.07 stock) plus the literally flat torque curve, and it makes sense.
I thought a C6 was a 2800lb car..


Quick Reply: VIDEO: BMW 1-series M Coupe Officially Revealed



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:05 PM.